Skip to Content

Changes for page Hugo

Last modified by Hugo van Dijk on 2023/04/10 15:20
From version 3.1
edited by Hugo van Dijk
on 2023/02/22 13:27
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 1.1
edited by Hugo van Dijk
on 2023/02/21 23:08
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -5,29 +5,6 @@
5 5  Mark A. Neerincx · Ismini Psychoula ·
6 6  Marieke M. M. Peeters · Bernd Kreynen ·
7 7  Catharine Oertel
8 -
9 -* . Additionally, Chang et al. [11] tested the Paro robot in a nursing home in an 8-weeks trial and observed an increased willingness amongst participants to interact with the robot.
10 -* Paro was evaluated more positively, whereas the Guide robot could be improved in terms of making it more simple and improving its ergonomics
11 -* Hebesberger et al. [16] investigated the use of a robot as a walking group as-
12 -sistant at a care site accompanying adults with advanced dementia. The robot
13 -offered visual and acoustic stimulation. The findings suggested that a robot has
14 -the potential to enhance motivation, group coherence, and also mood within the
15 -walking group
16 -* For exercise and reminiscence
17 -* Music bingo
18 -* Robot becomes point of discussion & conversation
19 -* Used NAO robot
20 -* One participant being negative towards the robot can influence the rest.
21 -* Caretaker stresses that caretaker interference is needed for PwD to keep interacting with robot.
22 -* Ppl had trouble following movemenents sometimes.
23 -* Remenicense exercise made PwD active.
24 -* One participant scared of robot when it talked after being quiet for some time.
25 -* Caretaker states robot's main purpose should be conversational interaction, not exercise.
26 -* Robot should have less monotonic voice.
27 -* Ppl remembered robot but not the music/singing/dancing.
28 -* Ppl respond more to music than engage in talking
29 -* Not clear if positive effect on people's state.
30 -* Potentially, inviting to dance better effect than structured exercise.
31 -* Positive effect on cognitive activity.
32 -* Robot itself not perse positive effect on social interaction, but music does.
33 -* Over course of sessions, ppl interacted less with robot and more with each other. If not like robot from start ~-~-> stopped with study. Other ppl displayed continuously high interest levels.
8 +\\. Additionally, Chang et
9 +al. [11] tested the Paro robot in a nursing home in an 8-weeks trial and observed
10 +an increased willingness amongst participants to interact with the robot.