Skip to Content

Changes for page Hugo

Last modified by Hugo van Dijk on 2023/04/10 15:20
From version 2.1
edited by Hugo van Dijk
on 2023/02/22 11:53
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 1.1
edited by Hugo van Dijk
on 2023/02/21 23:08
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -5,11 +5,6 @@
5 5  Mark A. Neerincx · Ismini Psychoula ·
6 6  Marieke M. M. Peeters · Bernd Kreynen ·
7 7  Catharine Oertel
8 -
9 -* . Additionally, Chang et al. [11] tested the Paro robot in a nursing home in an 8-weeks trial and observed an increased willingness amongst participants to interact with the robot.
10 -* Paro was evaluated more positively, whereas the Guide robot could be improved in terms of making it more simple and improving its ergonomics
11 -* Hebesberger et al. [16] investigated the use of a robot as a walking group as-
12 -sistant at a care site accompanying adults with advanced dementia. The robot
13 -offered visual and acoustic stimulation. The findings suggested that a robot has
14 -the potential to enhance motivation, group coherence, and also mood within the
15 -walking group
8 +\\. Additionally, Chang et
9 +al. [11] tested the Paro robot in a nursing home in an 8-weeks trial and observed
10 +an increased willingness amongst participants to interact with the robot.