Changes for page b. Test

Summary

• Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Content

...	...	@@ -1,12 +1,8 @@
1	1	= 1. Introduction =
2	2
3		-We aim to measure the effectiveness of a robot with interactive storytelling, which provides personalization and opportunities for interaction and activities with the family members of the patients. The control situation was a storytelling robot which narrates the story without any interaction or personalization. We aim to measure the claims made earlier:
	3	+<include a short summary of the claims to be tested, i.e., the effects of the functions in a specfic use case>
4	4
5		-~1. The mood of the patient improves after the interactive storytelling session.
6	6
7		-2. The patient eats their meals with more eagerness.
8		-
9		-
10	10	= 2. Method =
11	11
12	12
...	...	@@ -23,15 +23,7 @@
23	23
24	24	== 2.4 Measures ==
25	25
26		-The experiment measured the differences between the non interactive storytelling robot (control situation) versus the interactive storytelling robot (experimental situation). After each interaction, the participant filled a questionnaire about how their experience with questions which could be answered on a scale of 1 to 5, with one being strongly disagree and 5 being strongly agree. The following questions were asked:
27	27
28		-~1.
29		-
30		-2.
31		-
32		-The answers to these questions for both questionnaires were recorded, and the p-value was calculated to find the significance of the differences.
33		-
34		-
35	35	== 2.5 Procedure ==
36	36
37	37	For the experiment, the following steps were performed for each participant:
...	...	@@ -56,12 +56,7 @@
56	56
57	57	== 2.6 Material ==
58	58
59		-The following materials were used during the experiments:
60	60
61		-~1. Laptops for consent forms, questionnaires and the code.
62		-
63		-2. The robot pepper.
64		-
65	65	= 3. Results =
66	66
67	67