Changes for page Tim - Self Reflection
Last modified by Tim Reddering on 2023/04/11 20:45
Summary
-
Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -26,26 +26,19 @@ 26 26 27 27 == Week 4: First Presentation == 28 28 29 - This week we hadthefirst presentation which are teammates gave. We workedtogether on the slidesanddid a test-presentationafter which I gave feedback.In this first presentationwe talked about ourproblemscenario, personas, stakeholders and presented our solution.I think the presentation went well and our story was clear.29 +What did I do?: Gave feedback on presentation. 30 30 31 +What did I learn?: How to give good feedback and good present what we found and designed. Also learned a lot from other presentations which I think was very interesting. Also learned a lot from the feedback. 31 31 32 - ==Week5:DesignSpecifications==33 +How did I do?: I think I did good with giving feedback, but could have helped with designing the slides. 33 33 34 -In the lecture I learned about emotional expression with eye colour but also body language with the robot. After that I learned about the evaluation and different methods of evaluation. We learned about ethical issues and that we needed to have consent of the participant. Lastly, we talked about ontologies. 35 35 36 - Inour group wediscussed whatkindofevaluation we wanted to do. We agreed we wantedto do interactive storytelling vs non-interactive storytelling. The evaluationwould be asummativeassessment with a questionnaire. And, of course, we are going to ask consent.36 +== Week 5: Design Specifications == 37 37 38 - 39 39 == Week 6: Implementation and Initial Testings == 40 40 41 -This week we worked on the robot First, we tried to understand the software used for controlling the robot. Second, we tried to use the robot and looked how the robot react to different inputs. Once we understood the software and the robot, we got to work. We programmed two stories for the robot: one about thanksgiving and one about a picnic. We tested the stories and found that some things did not really work. For example, the audio input did not always work. We decided that if talking to the robot did not work, we should be able to make the choice on our tablet/computer. This way we cycled through the design and came to a good working design. 42 - 43 - 44 44 == Week 7: Evaluation == 45 45 46 -This week we did the evaluation. We did our own evaluation together with two other groups so we could help each other. Ou 47 - 48 - 49 49 == Week 8: Final Presentation == 50 50 51 51 At the start of this week, on Monday, we had our final presentation. We worked on the slides and discussed what was important to include and also what could be left out. A test-presentation in our own group was done to make sure everything we told was clear.