Skip to Content

Changes for page Tim - Self Reflection

Last modified by Tim Reddering on 2023/04/11 20:45
From version 2.33
edited by Tim Reddering
on 2023/04/11 20:25
Change comment: (Autosaved)
To version 2.20
edited by Tim Reddering
on 2023/04/11 19:20
Change comment: (Autosaved)

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -21,21 +21,19 @@
21 21  
22 22  This week I joined the team and they brought me up to speed. I was introduced to the subject and how it would improve lives of people with dementia.
23 23  
24 -In this week's lecture, I learned about how the PAL project used the SCE design cycle to build a diabetes management robot for children with Type 1 diabetes. The lecture emphasized the significance of stakeholder analysis and building value stories to inform our design, which we applied in finalizing our personas, stakeholders, environment, design, and problem scenario for the project presentation in Week 4.
25 25  
26 26  
27 27  == Week 4: First Presentation ==
28 28  
29 -This week we had the first presentation which are teammates gave. We worked together on the slides and did a test-presentation after which I gave feedback. In this first presentation we talked about our problem scenario, personas, stakeholders and presented our solution. I think the presentation went well and our story was clear.
28 +What did I do?: Gave feedback on presentation.
30 30  
30 +What did I learn?: How to give good feedback and good present what we found and designed. Also learned a lot from other presentations which I think was very interesting. Also learned a lot from the feedback.
31 31  
32 -== Week 5: Design Specifications ==
32 +How did I do?: I think I did good with giving feedback, but could have helped with designing the slides.
33 33  
34 -In the lecture I learned about emotional expression with eye colour but also body language with the robot. After that I learned about the evaluation and different methods of evaluation. We learned about ethical issues and that we needed to have consent of the participant. Lastly, we talked about ontologies.
35 35  
36 -In our group we discussed what kind of evaluation we wanted to do. We agreed we wanted to do interactive storytelling vs non-interactive storytelling. The evaluation would be a summative assasement with a questionaire. And, or
35 +== Week 5: Design Specifications ==
37 37  
38 -
39 39  == Week 6: Implementation and Initial Testings ==
40 40  
41 41  == Week 7: Evaluation ==