Changes for page Tim - Self Reflection

Summary

• Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Content

...	...	@@ -21,21 +21,25 @@
21	21
22	22	This week I joined the team and they brought me up to speed. I was introduced to the subject and how it would improve lives of people with dementia.
23	23
	24	+In this week's lecture, I learned about how the PAL project used the SCE design cycle to build a diabetes management robot for children with Type 1 diabetes. The lecture emphasized the significance of stakeholder analysis and building value stories to inform our design, which we applied in finalizing our personas, stakeholders, environment, design, and problem scenario for the project presentation in Week 4.
24	24
25	25
26	26	== Week 4: First Presentation ==
27	27
28		-What did I do?: Gave feedback on presentation.
	29	+This week we had the first presentation which are teammates gave. We worked together on the slides and did a test-presentation after which I gave feedback. In this first presentation we talked about our problem scenario, personas, stakeholders and presented our solution. I think the presentation went well and our story was clear.
29	29
30		-What did I learn?: How to give good feedback and good present what we found and designed. Also learned a lot from other presentations which I think was very interesting. Also learned a lot from the feedback.
31	31
32		-How did I do?: I think I did good with giving feedback, but could have helped with designing the slides.
	32	+== Week 5: Design Specifications ==
33	33
	34	+In the lecture I learned about emotional expression with eye colour but also body language with the robot. After that I learned about the evaluation and different methods of evaluation. We learned about ethical issues and that we needed to have consent of the participant. Lastly, we talked about ontologies.
34	34
35		-== Week 5: Design Specifications ==
	36	+In our group we discussed what kind of evaluation we wanted to do. We agreed we wanted to do interactive storytelling vs non-interactive storytelling. The evaluation would be a summative assessment with a questionnaire. And, of course, we are going to ask consent.
36	36
	38	+
37	37	== Week 6: Implementation and Initial Testings ==
38	38
	41	+This week we worked on the robot First, we tried to understand the software used for controlling the robot. Second, we tried to use the robot and looked how the robot react to different inputs. Once we understood the software and the robot, we got to work. We programmed two stories for the robot: one about thanksgiving and one about a picnic. We tested the stories a
	42	+
39	39	== Week 7: Evaluation ==
40	40
41	41	== Week 8: Final Presentation ==