Changes for page Simran - Self Reflection

Summary

• Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Content

...	...	@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
34	34	We also discussed in detail about our personas and their associated value stories, in order to inform our design decisions better.
35	35	Then we were introduced to scenario-based design and its benefits in reflecting the current situation (problem scenario) and the envisioned future (design scenario). We used our personas and value stories to formulate the problem and design scenario which would then be formalized into our main Use Case.
36	36
37		-We focused on defining our environment and stakeholders and further developing our personas and enhancing the problem and design scenarios for the rest of the week. Building the scenarios helped me to reflect on the reasons why we were building a human-robot interaction system in the first place, and allowed for visualization how we would want the interactions to flow.
	37	+We focused on defining our environment and stakeholders and further developing our personas and enhancing the problem and design scenarios for the rest of the week. Building the scenarios helped me to reflect on the reasons why we were building a human-robot interaction system in the first place, and allowed for visualizing how we would want the interactions to flow.
38	38
39	39
40	40	=== Week 3: PAL project, Specification ===
...	...	@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@
55	55	=== Week 4: Group Presentation - Midterm ===
56	56
57	57	(% class="wikigeneratedid" %)
58		-My teammates presented the Foundation and Specification of our project. Our presentation was focused on detailing the environment, stakeholders, and persons for our system. We further dived into our problem and design scenarios, and our design plan for a robotic intervention for people with dementia through interactive storytelling, back by scientific sources. The question/answer session helped provide a third-person view of how our design was perceived by others and how we could improve it. We got valuable feedback for the presentation, specially around designing our evaluation study for what was feasible for our scope.
	58	+My teammates presented the Foundation and Specification of our project. Our presentation was focused on detailing the environment, stakeholders, and persons for our system. We further dived into our problem and design scenarios, and our design plan for a robotic intervention for people with dementia through interactive storytelling, backed by scientific sources. The question/answer session helped provide a third-person view of how our design was perceived by others and how we could improve it. We got valuable feedback for the presentation, specially around designing our evaluation study for what was feasible for our scope.
59	59
60	60	(% class="wikigeneratedid" id="H" %)
61	61	I was also inspired a lot by attending the other groups' presentations and getting to know how they were approaching the design for their use cases.
...	...	@@ -63,29 +63,33 @@
63	63	We used the rest of the week to reflect on the midterm feedback and incorporate it into our design.
64	64
65	65
66		-=== Week 5: Evaluation ===
	66	+=== Week 5: Design Specifications ===
67	67
68		-==== Lecture: ====
	68	+==== Lecture: Design Patterns, Design Rationale ====
69	69
70	70	====
71		-Lab session: Prototype ====
	71	+Lab session: Planning Evaluations ====
72	72
73	73
74		-=== Week 6: ===
75	75
76		-==== Lecture: Intersectionality, Inclusive Design, Universal Access ====
	75	+=== Week 6: Prototype Implementation and Initial Testing ===
77	77
	77	+==== Lecture: Ontologies ====
	78	+
78	78	====
79		-Lab session: Evaluation Study Planning ====
	80	+Lab session: Implementing prototype, Evaluation Study Planning ====
80	80
	82	+We were given the time for the lab session to work on our prototype and planning our evaluation.
81	81
82		-=== Week 7: ===
83	83
	85	+=== Week 7: ===
	86	+
84	84	==== Lecture: Human-Agent/Robot Teamwork ====
85	85
86	86	====
87		-Lab session: Evaluation Study ====
	90	+Lab session: Conducted Evaluation ====
88	88
	92	+We used the lab session to prepare our evaluation.
89	89
90	90	=== Week 8: Group Presentation - Endterm ===
91	91