Skip to Content

Changes for page Manali - Self Reflection

Last modified by Manali Shah on 2023/04/11 12:30
From version 5.2
edited by Manali Shah
on 2023/04/11 11:58
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 4.3
edited by Manali Shah
on 2023/04/10 22:47
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -66,10 +66,9 @@
66 66  
67 67  Secondly, we must gather users' needs BEFORE the start of the design, and not assume what they may or may not need, because more often than not, designs turn out to be redundant for the users themselves.
68 68  
69 -This week we performed the pilot study of our project. We worked with Pepper at the Insyght Lab to test the basic connections and familiarize ourselves with the robot. The tablet did not work, which we later realized is an issue in the connection with InteractiveRobots. We tested voice inputs and touch inputs, and came to the conclusion that voice input may not be so accurate, so went ahead with a backup touch input instead.
69 +-> pilot study
70 70  
71 71  **Week 7**
72 72  
73 -This week, we tested the interactive version of the robot with the final code. We had two story versions: Thanksgiving and a Picnic. Both of them were tested with all participants involved: nurse, family member and the patient. We tested the prompts and focused on whether they made logical sense in the context. Since voice input was not reliable, the nurse had the job of clicking on the correct button (on screen) to make choices. It gave chances for the family members to interact with each other, and when the interaction was done, the nurse would also
74 74  
75 75