Skip to Content

Changes for page 4. Evaluation Methods

Last modified by Deepali Prabhu on 2023/04/10 15:02
From version 7.1
edited by Deepali Prabhu
on 2023/04/10 14:59
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 8.1
edited by Deepali Prabhu
on 2023/04/10 15:02
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
14 14  
15 15  There are several HRI frameworks to determine the general likability, usability and effectiveness of our Social Robot like Godspeed, SUS.
16 16  
17 -However we decide on using the **Physical Activity Enjoyment scale(PACES)** with our proxy participants as it is most suitable for our use case and socio cognitive theories included in our design. More about this is explained in the below subsection.
17 +However we decide on using the **Physical Activity Enjoyment scale(PACES)[8]** with our proxy participants as it is most suitable for our use case and socio cognitive theories included in our design.
18 18  
19 19  
20 20  
... ... @@ -37,5 +37,3 @@
37 37  [7] Kurniawan, S. (2004). Interaction design: Beyond human-computer interaction by Preece, Sharp, and Rogers (2001), ISBN 0471492787.
38 38  
39 39  [8] Kendzierski, Deborah & DeCarlo, Kenneth. (1991). Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale: Two Validation Studies. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology. 13. 50-64. 10.1123/jsep.13.1.50.
40 -
41 -[9] Mullen, S.P., Olson, E.A., Phillips, S.M. //et al.// Measuring enjoyment of physical activity in older adults: invariance of the physical activity enjoyment scale (paces) across groups and time. //Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act// **8**, 103 (2011). https:~/~/doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-8-103