Skip to Content

Changes for page 4. Evaluation Methods

Last modified by Deepali Prabhu on 2023/04/10 15:02
From version 7.1
edited by Deepali Prabhu
on 2023/04/10 14:59
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 6.1
edited by Deepali Prabhu
on 2023/04/10 14:56
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -14,12 +14,15 @@
14 14  
15 15  There are several HRI frameworks to determine the general likability, usability and effectiveness of our Social Robot like Godspeed, SUS.
16 16  
17 -However we decide on using the **Physical Activity Enjoyment scale(PACES)** with our proxy participants as it is most suitable for our use case and socio cognitive theories included in our design. More about this is explained in the below subsection.
18 18  
18 +== PACES: Physical activity enjoyment scale. ==
19 19  
20 +While the above methods are extremely suitable for conducting the experiment with actual Dementia patients, for our proxy participants we use the PACES[8] scale which is a self reported questionnaire that tries to asses different aspects of enjoyment such as sense of accomplishment, engagement, stress reduction/improved mood. It encompasses all the aspects that we require to answer our research questions. It also aligns with the socio cognitive theories we have inculcated in our design; mainly the self determination theory. Studies have validated its usage and effectiveness in older adults as well as younger making it furthermore suitable for our use case.
20 20  
21 21  
22 22  
24 +
25 +
23 23  References
24 24  
25 25  [1] Ready RE, Ott BR. Quality of Life measures for dementia. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003 Apr 23;1:11. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-1-11. PMID: 12740036; PMCID: PMC155631.