Changes for page 4. Evaluation Methods
Last modified by Deepali Prabhu on 2023/04/10 15:02
From version 5.1
edited by Deepali Prabhu
on 2023/04/10 14:56
on 2023/04/10 14:56
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
To version 6.1
edited by Deepali Prabhu
on 2023/04/10 14:56
on 2023/04/10 14:56
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ 15 15 There are several HRI frameworks to determine the general likability, usability and effectiveness of our Social Robot like Godspeed, SUS. 16 16 17 17 18 -== PACES == 18 +== PACES: Physical activity enjoyment scale. == 19 19 20 20 While the above methods are extremely suitable for conducting the experiment with actual Dementia patients, for our proxy participants we use the PACES[8] scale which is a self reported questionnaire that tries to asses different aspects of enjoyment such as sense of accomplishment, engagement, stress reduction/improved mood. It encompasses all the aspects that we require to answer our research questions. It also aligns with the socio cognitive theories we have inculcated in our design; mainly the self determination theory. Studies have validated its usage and effectiveness in older adults as well as younger making it furthermore suitable for our use case. 21 21