Skip to Content

Changes for page 4. Evaluation Methods

Last modified by Deepali Prabhu on 2023/04/10 15:02
From version 4.1
edited by Deepali Prabhu
on 2023/04/10 14:43
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 8.1
edited by Deepali Prabhu
on 2023/04/10 15:02
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -14,13 +14,12 @@
14 14  
15 15  There are several HRI frameworks to determine the general likability, usability and effectiveness of our Social Robot like Godspeed, SUS.
16 16  
17 +However we decide on using the **Physical Activity Enjoyment scale(PACES)[8]** with our proxy participants as it is most suitable for our use case and socio cognitive theories included in our design.
17 17  
18 -While the above methods are extremely suitable for conducting the experiment with actual Dementia patients, for our proxy partifi
19 19  
20 20  
21 21  
22 22  
23 -
24 24  References
25 25  
26 26  [1] Ready RE, Ott BR. Quality of Life measures for dementia. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003 Apr 23;1:11. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-1-11. PMID: 12740036; PMCID: PMC155631.
... ... @@ -36,3 +36,5 @@
36 36  [5] Saeed Jaydari Fard, Andrew P. Lavender. (2019) [[A comparison of task-based mental fatigue between healthy males and females>>url:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/21641846.2019.1562582]]. //Fatigue: Biomedicine, Health & Behavior// 7:1, pages 1-11.
37 37  
38 38  [7] Kurniawan, S. (2004). Interaction design: Beyond human-computer interaction by Preece, Sharp, and Rogers (2001), ISBN 0471492787.
38 +
39 +[8] Kendzierski, Deborah & DeCarlo, Kenneth. (1991). Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale: Two Validation Studies. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology. 13. 50-64. 10.1123/jsep.13.1.50.