Changes for page b. Test
Last modified by Ilinca Rentea on 2023/04/11 12:25
From version 3.2
edited by Marijn Roelvink
on 2023/03/30 12:55
on 2023/03/30 12:55
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
To version 3.1
edited by Varun Singh
on 2023/03/22 13:45
on 2023/03/22 13:45
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Page properties (2 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -XWiki. MarijnRoelvink1 +XWiki.varunsingh3000 - Content
-
... ... @@ -22,18 +22,17 @@ 22 22 23 23 == 2.2 Experimental Design == 24 24 25 -For the experiment, we used a within-subject design,aswedid nothave enoughparticipants todoa statisticallysignificantbetween-subjectstudy.To mitigatethetransfer effectscaused by doingthe sameactivitytwice,wehadhalf oftheparticipantsstartingwith the controlcondition, and halfoftheparticipantsstartingwiththetestcondition.25 +For the experiment, we used a between-subject design. Two control groups were set up and this allowed us to properly proceed ahead with the evaluation of our research question. The first control group did not interact with the robot at all whereas the second group did. This helped us to avoid bias within our results. 26 26 27 27 == 2.3 Tasks == 28 28 29 -(% style="color:#000000; font-family:Arial; font-size:11pt; font-style:normal; font-variant:normal; font-weight:400; text-decoration:none; white-space:pre-wrap" %)We set up two tasks. One for the control conditionand one for the testcondition.29 +(% style="color:#000000; font-family:Arial; font-size:11pt; font-style:normal; font-variant:normal; font-weight:400; text-decoration:none; white-space:pre-wrap" %)We set up two tasks. One for the control group and one for the test group. 30 30 31 31 (% style="line-height:1.38" %) 32 -(% style="color:#000000; font-family:Arial; font-size:11pt; font-style:normal; font-variant:normal; font-weight:400; text-decoration:none; white-space:pre-wrap" %)For the testcondition, wefirstprovided theparticipantwithpaintinganddrawingutensils and aanvas.Then,we starteduptherobottoguidetheactivity.Therobotwas controlled through a Wizard of Oz system.32 +(% style="color:#000000; font-family:Arial; font-size:11pt; font-style:normal; font-variant:normal; font-weight:400; text-decoration:none; white-space:pre-wrap" %)For the control group, we put each participant in front of a canvas and provided them with pencils and watercolors and asked them to paint whatever they wanted to. 33 33 34 - 35 35 (% style="line-height:1.38" %) 36 -(% style="color: rgb(0,0,0); font-family:4.6667px; white-space:control condition, we provided the participantwithart suppliesas well, butheretherobotwas notinvolved. Insteadtheyreceivedan activitysheetwhich guided the participantsin the same flowherobot would do. The only main guidance that couldn't begivenon paperwas the searchfunctionforasuitable topic or personal pictureto draw/paint.35 +(% style="color:#000000; font-family:Arial; font-size:11pt; font-style:normal; font-variant:normal; font-weight:400; text-decoration:none; white-space:pre-wrap" %)For the test group, we provided them with the painting and drawing utensils and the canvas as well, but we had our robot guiding the activity. The robot was controlled through a Wizard of Oz system. 37 37 38 38 == 2.4 Measures == 39 39 ... ... @@ -40,13 +40,13 @@ 40 40 (% style="color:#000000; font-family:Arial; font-size:11pt; font-style:normal; font-variant:normal; font-weight:400; text-decoration:none; white-space:pre-wrap" %)We solely used qualitative measures for our experiment, as painting is a highly subjective experience. 41 41 42 42 (% style="line-height:1.38" %) 43 -(% style="color:#000000; font-family:Arial; font-size:11pt; font-style:normal; font-variant:normal; font-weight:400; text-decoration:none; white-space:pre-wrap" %)We gave each participant a questionnaire before and after the session. 42 +(% style="color:#000000; font-family:Arial; font-size:11pt; font-style:normal; font-variant:normal; font-weight:400; text-decoration:none; white-space:pre-wrap" %)We gave each participant a questionnaire before and after the session. In both the before and after questionnaires we measured their mood and satisfaction to derive the change that the session brought to their mental status. 44 44 45 45 (% style="line-height:1.38" %) 46 -(% style="color:#000000; font-family:Arial; font-size:11pt; font-style:normal; font-variant:normal; font-weight:400; text-decoration:none; white-space:pre-wrap" %) In thebefore questionnaire,weasked themabout their mood,paintingexperienceandgeneral attitudeorobots. This was donetolater check if thosevariableshaveinteractioneffects with the main results.See [[here >>https://forms.office.com/Pages/ResponsePage.aspx?id=TVJuCSlpMECM04q0LeCIewsut64TrQ5KmT3QxEFJ2z1URElCMFZGWFFOM085MFVMOExXNVdLRjRSNC4u]]thebefore questionnaire.45 +(% style="color:#000000; font-family:Arial; font-size:11pt; font-style:normal; font-variant:normal; font-weight:400; text-decoration:none; white-space:pre-wrap" %)We also asked them for more specific feedback on different functions of the robot so we could find areas to improve, as this was the first prototype. 47 47 48 48 (% style="line-height:1.38" %) 49 -(% style="color:#000000; font-family:Arial; font-size:11pt; font-style:normal; font-variant:normal; font-weight:400; text-decoration:none; white-space:pre-wrap" %) In theafter questionnaire, we measured their experienceoftheactivity, usingan adaptedversionof thePACE questionnaireused in [1]. Wealsoaskedtwoextra questionstogaugetheirlikelihood of long-termengagement,and perceived self competence. See[[here >>https://forms.office.com/Pages/ResponsePage.aspx?id=TVJuCSlpMECM04q0LeCIewsut64TrQ5KmT3QxEFJ2z1UN1M0T1pLU1hTN1NIRkw5MjhSWldPRzJUWC4u]]theafterquestionnaire.48 +(% style="color:#000000; font-family:Arial; font-size:11pt; font-style:normal; font-variant:normal; font-weight:400; text-decoration:none; white-space:pre-wrap" %)Lastly, we also measured their previous experience with painting, to see if the robot has a different impact on experienced and inexperienced painters. 50 50 51 51 == 2.5 Procedure == 52 52 ... ... @@ -74,29 +74,8 @@ 74 74 75 75 = 3. Results = 76 76 77 -== RQ1: == 78 78 79 -The result of 1 is : Ttest_indResult(statistic=1.4975794013422261, pvalue=0.14346974449383315) 80 -The result of 2 is : Ttest_indResult(statistic=-1.4223714338623947, pvalue=0.16402857963283687) 81 -The result of 3 is : Ttest_indResult(statistic=-1.3247032534410947, pvalue=0.19410483688054006) 82 -The result of 4 is : Ttest_indResult(statistic=0.21883172517636015, pvalue=0.8280894550130451) 83 -The result of 5 is : Ttest_indResult(statistic=1.1103001118645561, pvalue=0.2746606492169669) 84 -The result of 6 is : Ttest_indResult(statistic=-0.4963635881027171, pvalue=0.622831867082795) 85 -The result of 7 is : Ttest_indResult(statistic=1.7856873313329575, pvalue=0.08307261813922004) 86 -The result of 8 is : Ttest_indResult(statistic=-0.8367967692050108, pvalue=0.4085500396596581) 87 -The result of 9 is : Ttest_indResult(statistic=0.9858982364095322, pvalue=0.3311474288136296) 88 -The result of 10 is : Ttest_indResult(statistic=0.5978655614807643, pvalue=0.5538913868506702) 89 -The result of 11 is : Ttest_indResult(statistic=0.6993338931663364, pvalue=0.48910044218053905) 90 -The result of 12 is : Ttest_indResult(statistic=-0.6636373315087242, pvalue=0.5113976377267673) 91 -The result of 13 is : Ttest_indResult(statistic=1.681821310426211, pvalue=0.10176776499485188) 92 -The result of 14 is : Ttest_indResult(statistic=-2.6406213957953537, pvalue=0.012408357809218102) 93 - 94 94 = 4. Discussion = 95 95 96 96 97 97 = 5. Conclusions = 98 - 99 - 100 -=== References === 101 - 102 -1. Mullen, S.P., Olson, E.A., Phillips, S.M. //et al.// Measuring enjoyment of physical activity in older adults: invariance of the physical activity enjoyment scale (paces) across groups and time. //Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act// **8**, 103 (2011). https:~/~/doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-8-103