Skip to Content

Changes for page b. Test

Last modified by Ilinca Rentea on 2023/04/11 12:25
From version 12.1
edited by Ilinca Rentea
on 2023/04/11 12:12
Change comment: Uploaded new attachment "11_HRX-checklist for human research.pdf", version 1.1
To version 10.2
edited by Marijn Roelvink
on 2023/04/10 21:48
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -XWiki.IlincaRentea
1 +XWiki.MarijnRoelvink
Content
... ... @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@
69 69  
70 70  = 3. Results =
71 71  
72 -We grouped the results of the PACE questionnaires into two partitions:  One set of questions relating more to RQ1 and one set of questions relating more to RQ2. In the following sections we will outline the results for both research questions.
72 +We grouped the results of the PACE questionnaires into two partitions:  One set of questions relating more to RQ1 and one set of questions relating more to RQ2.
73 73  
74 74  
75 75  (% class="wikigeneratedid" %)
... ... @@ -77,7 +77,7 @@
77 77  
78 78  [[image:RQ1.png||height="297" width="812"]]
79 79  
80 -As shown in the figure above, the results were not exactly significant. The only question that obtained a reasonable p-score (P=0.022) was Q14. This implies that the robot did provide for a more immersive activity where the urge to do something else was diminished. Due to the fact that the robot gives more active guidance than paper instructions, it could be hypothesized that the participants were more actively feeling part of the activity.
80 +As one can see, the results were not exactly significant. The only question that obtained a reasonable p-score (P=0.022) was Q14. This implies that the robot did provide for a more immersive activity where the urge to do something else was diminished. Due to the fact that the robot gives more active guidance than paper instructions, it could be hypothesized that the participants were more actively feeling part of the activity.
81 81  
82 82  
83 83  **RQ2: How does the assistance provided by a social robot influence the level of agitation in art-related tasks for people with dementia?**
... ... @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@
85 85  [[image:1681152536590-277.png||height="327" width="783"]]
86 86  
87 87  (% class="wikigeneratedid" %)
88 -For this research question the results also proved not to be conclusive. The only result that could be viewed as remotely significant is the result for question 7 (P=0.073). This could be caused either by the positive encouragement given by the robot, and/or the added functionality that the robot could search for pictures to draw.
88 +For this research question the results also proved not to be conclusive. The only result that could be viewed as remotely significant is the result for question 7 (P=0.073). This could be caused either by the positive encouragement given by the robot, and/or the added functionality of searching for pictures to draw.
89 89  
90 90  (% class="wikigeneratedid" %)
91 91  **Aggregated score**
11_HRX-checklist for human research.pdf
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -XWiki.IlincaRentea
Size
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -370.4 KB
Content