Step 4: Claims

1. Since the time required for the painting activity no longer requires to be done by the caretaker, the caretaker's overall schedule and timings should reflect the additional time they now have for other critical tasks. The caretaker, therefore, has more time in their schedule. (Measurement: **Amount of time saved by the caretaker per day**)

18

1. No information regarding the painting preferences of different patients would have to be noted down, and no background prerequisite knowledge is required by the caretaker. (Measurement: No prerequisite knowledge and information has to be noted)

19

1. No information about the painting session has to be recorded by the caretaker. Also, the caretaker's time would be saved for other tasks. (Measurement: **Amount of time saved by the caretaker per day**)

B) PwD

1. The PwD will not have to rely on another human being for accomplishing the task of painting. The robot will help them with painting whenever required. (Measurement: A session with the robot which involves active conversation regarding the subject of the painting, colors to be used, etc)

24

1. For measuring whether the Pwd Enjoyed the session, the Robot can ask them to provide feedack at the end of a session. The feedback needs not to be a long conversation but it can be in the form of a rating between 1 to 5. With 5 being the highest. **(Painting session feedback: from patient/can also ask caretaker if the patient is not able to)**

25

1. To measure the expression of identity through painting, the past and current notes of the caretaker regarding the patient can be collected and signs of improvement can be taken into account. Feedback from the caretaker can be taken on how improved the sense of identity of the patient is and the caretaker can be asked t rate between 1 to 5, with 5 being the maximum improvement and 1 being high deterioration (**Sense of Identity Feedback: from caretaker**).

26

1. To measure the quality of interaction with the daughter, we can ask the daughter to provide a feedback on the improved quality of conversation. The feedback can be done in the form of a rating between 1 to 5. (1= worse quality of conversation than in the past. 2= a little bad than before. 3=no improvement. 4= slight improvement. 5= great improvement) **(Conversation with relatives feedback: from relative)**

C) Daughter

1. To measure how the relationship of the daughter with the father has improved, we can ask the daughter for a feedback on how the use of the robot has impacted the father daughter relationship. The rating can be done from 1 to 5 (1= relationship got worst than before, 2= relationship is a little bad than before, relationship stays the same, 4= relationship improved a little, relationship improved significantly) **(Relations with relative feedback: from relative).**

31

1. By making the daughter share parts of her life through an easy medium, we reduce the extra time and effort that the daughter has to go through in explaining such details directly to her father. This can be measured by asking the daughter to provide a feedback on how the usage of robot has affected her state of mind. The rating can be done again from 1 to 5, with 5 being the most effective and 1 being the least** (Relative's state of mind feedback: from relative)**.

32

1. Since we provide a topic to the daughter, the daughter does not have to make an extra effort of going through all her memories and looking for drawing topics. Thus the robot is making the daughter's task easier and to measure this, we can again ask the daughter for feedback on how easy her conversations are with the robot. The rating again can be done from 1 to 5, with 5 being the easiest and 1 being the lowest. **(Relative's ease of use feedback: from relative)**.

33

34

**Measurement of negative consequences:**

35

36

1. To measure if the patient is frustrated with the tools, interaction of the patient with the robot can be monitored. Emotion recognition can be used to see the patient's attitude towards the robot. (Emotions such as Anger, fear, disgust, happiness, sadness, surprise and neutral can be analyzed)

37

1. {{mention reference="XWiki.varunsingh3000" style="FULL_NAME" anchor="XWiki-varunsingh3000-okraab"/}} we need to disciss the rest of the points

)))

|(((

[[image:14.png]]

//Benchmark//

)))|For each measurement, what are the benchmarks (criteria)? (i.e., what are desired values?)|(((

44

Benchmark criteria for positive consequences:

45

46

1. Amount of time saved by the caretaker per day: We aim to save atleast 45 minutes of the caretaker's time per patient per day.

47

1. Painting session feedback: We aim to get a rating of more than 3.

48

1. Sense of identity feedback: We aim to get a rating of more than 3.

49

1. Conversations with relative feedback: We aim to get a rating of more than 3.

50

1. Relations with relative feedback: We aim to get a rating of more than 3.

51

1. Relative's state of mind feedback: We aim to get a rating of more than 3.

52

1. Relative's ease of use feedback: We aim to get a rating of more than 3.

53

54

Benchmark criteria for negative consequences:

)))

|(((

[[image:13.png]]

//Demonstration of AI-functionality//

62

)))|Can you describe how you could demonstrate that your AI function (s) achieve(s) the effects that you listed in the previous question?|(((

63

How to achieve the positive consequences listed above:

64

65

1. The robot will help the patient paint. Moreover, the robot will be humble and patient with the Pwd, this will create a sense of comfort for the Pwd and then they will be willing to spend more time with the robot. Thus the caretaker can get the extra time in this case.

66

1. To get a good feedback of the painting session, the robot will try to keep up a healthy conversation with the patient and be supportive of their thoughts and actions. With respect to painting, the robot can also guide the patient by showing a picture of the painting that the patient would like to draw, for example an apple. The robot can also discuss different colors that can be used at any given time to help the patient. The robot can also make the patient see the outside weather conditions and make them draw the things outside. In this way, the robot patient interaction improves and the patient also gets more involved.

67

1. The agent first interacts with the daughter to get information about the patient and then the agent helps the patient draw the similar item. For instance, if the patient loves playing basketball, then the robot can make the patient draw a basketball. This helps the patient identify the things that they like and help in restoring parts of their identity.

68

1. According to [[https:~~/~~/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6025004/>>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6025004/]] art helps in improving the quality of life of people with dementia. Thus the overall conversations and relations between the father and daughter will improve too.

69

1. To improve the feedback on Relative's state of mind, the robot only asks the daughter for certain memories or information about the patient. The robot then conveys all the information to the patient while helping them paint. Thus, the daughter does not have to worry about her father to a certain extent.

70

1. To improve the ease of use for the relative, we have a small conversation with the daughter where we narrow down the possibilities of patients' likes and dislikes. For example, the robot can directly ask the daughter about the hobbies of the patient. Since the topics are already narrowed down, the daughter does not have to think much about providing the information.

71

72

73

How to overcome the negative consequences listed above:

)))

Wiki source code of Step 4: Claims

Navigation

Need help?