Skip to Content

Changes for page Step 4: Claims

Last modified by Varun Singh on 2023/03/06 13:27
From version 13.1
edited by Varun Singh
on 2023/03/06 12:26
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 14.1
edited by Varun Singh
on 2023/03/06 13:27
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
21 21  B) PwD
22 22  
23 23  1. The PwD will not have to rely on another human being for accomplishing the task of painting. The robot will help them with painting whenever required. (Measurement: A session with the robot which involves active conversation regarding the subject of the painting, colors to be used, etc)
24 -1. For measuring whether the Pwd Enjoyed the session, the Robot can ask them to provide feedack at the end of a session. The feedback needs not to be a long conversation but it can be in the form of a rating between 1 to 5. With 5 being the highest. **(Painting session feedback: from patient/can also ask caretaker if the patient is not able to)**
24 +1. For measuring whether the Pwd Enjoyed the session, the Robot can ask them to provide feedack at the end of a session. The feedback needs not to be a long conversation but it can be in the form of a rating between 1 to 5. With 5 being the highest. **(Painting session feedback/emotion recognition: from patient/can also ask caretaker if the patient is not able to or use facial emotion recognition)**
25 25  1. To measure the expression of identity through painting, the past and current notes of the caretaker regarding the patient can be collected and signs of improvement can be taken into account. Feedback from the caretaker can be taken on how improved the sense of identity of the patient is and the caretaker can be asked t rate between 1 to 5, with 5 being the maximum improvement and 1 being high deterioration (**Sense of Identity Feedback: from caretaker and the patient**).
26 26  1. To measure the quality of interaction with the daughter, we can ask the daughter to provide a feedback on the improved quality of conversation. The feedback can be done in the form of a rating between 1 to 5. (1= worse quality of conversation than in the past. 2= a little bad than before. 3=no improvement. 4= slight improvement. 5= great improvement) **(Conversation with relatives feedback: from relative)**
27 27