Changes for page Step 4: Claims

Last modified by Varun Singh on 2023/03/06 13:27

From version 13.1
edited by Varun Singh
on 2023/03/06 12:26
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 11.1
edited by Varun Singh
on 2023/02/22 18:47
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -22,12 +22,12 @@
22 22  
23 23  1. The PwD will not have to rely on another human being for accomplishing the task of painting. The robot will help them with painting whenever required. (Measurement: A session with the robot which involves active conversation regarding the subject of the painting, colors to be used, etc)
24 24  1. For measuring whether the Pwd Enjoyed the session, the Robot can ask them to provide feedack at the end of a session. The feedback needs not to be a long conversation but it can be in the form of a rating between 1 to 5. With 5 being the highest. **(Painting session feedback: from patient/can also ask caretaker if the patient is not able to)**
25 -1. To measure the expression of identity through painting, the past and current notes of the caretaker regarding the patient can be collected and signs of improvement can be taken into account. Feedback from the caretaker can be taken on how improved the sense of identity of the patient is and the caretaker can be asked t rate between 1 to 5, with 5 being the maximum improvement and 1 being high deterioration (**Sense of Identity Feedback: from caretaker and the patient**).
25 +1. To measure the expression of identity through painting, the past and current notes of the caretaker regarding the patient can be collected and signs of improvement can be taken into account. Feedback from the caretaker can be taken on how improved the sense of identity of the patient is and the caretaker can be asked t rate between 1 to 5, with 5 being the maximum improvement and 1 being high deterioration (**Sense of Identity Feedback: from caretaker**).
26 26  1. To measure the quality of interaction with the daughter, we can ask the daughter to provide a feedback on the improved quality of conversation. The feedback can be done in the form of a rating between 1 to 5. (1= worse quality of conversation than in the past. 2= a little bad than before. 3=no improvement. 4= slight improvement. 5= great improvement) **(Conversation with relatives feedback: from relative)**
27 27  
28 28  C) Daughter
29 29  
30 -1. To measure how the relationship of the daughter with the father has improved, we can ask the daughter for a feedback on how the use of the robot has impacted the father daughter relationship. The rating can be done from 1 to 5 (1= relationship got worst than before, 2= relationship is a little bad than before, relationship stays the same, 4= relationship improved a little, relationship improved significantly) **(Relations with relative feedback: from relative + PwD).**
30 +1. To measure how the relationship of the daughter with the father has improved, we can ask the daughter for a feedback on how the use of the robot has impacted the father daughter relationship. The rating can be done from 1 to 5 (1= relationship got worst than before, 2= relationship is a little bad than before, relationship stays the same, 4= relationship improved a little, relationship improved significantly) **(Relations with relative feedback: from relative).**
31 31  1. By making the daughter share parts of her life through an easy medium, we reduce the extra time and effort that the daughter has to go through in explaining such details directly to her father. This can be measured by asking the daughter to provide a feedback on how the usage of robot has affected her state of mind. The rating can be done again from 1 to 5, with 5 being the most effective and 1 being the least** (Relative's state of mind feedback: from relative)**.
32 32  1. Since we provide a topic to the daughter, the daughter does not have to make an extra effort of going through all her memories and looking for drawing topics. Thus the robot is making the daughter's task easier and to measure this, we can again ask the daughter for feedback on how easy her conversations are with the robot. The rating again can be done from 1 to 5, with 5 being the easiest and 1 being the lowest. **(Relative's ease of use feedback: from relative)**.
33 33  
... ... @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
38 38  1. If the response time for a certain question/prompt is too long (find the general response time for PwD) then automatically call the caretaker as this would indicate that something has gone wrong. **(**Measurement: **Response time**)
39 39  1. After the session, the robot can ask for feedback regarding the preference of whether they liked painting with their caretaker or the robot. E.g. Do you love me? **(Robot likeability feedback: robot likeability in comparison to their caretaker)**
40 40  1. There would be a button on the screen displaying a statement like "Click here to make me act more human", which would keep a count of how many times the button was pressed.  **(**Measurement: **Humaness of the robot**)
41 +1. TBD
41 41  )))
42 42  |(((
43 43  [[image:14.png]]
... ... @@ -60,7 +60,8 @@
60 60  1. Patient's state of mind: We aim to have this criterion triggered less than 3 times during a session.
61 61  1. Session emergency: Since the response time exceeded a certain threshold, we call the caretaker. (We aim to have this criterion triggered less than 2 times in a session.)
62 62  1. Opinion of the patient regarding the change towards a robot: We aim to get a rating of more than 3. (We aim to have this criterion triggered less than 2 times in a session.)
63 -1. Humaness of the robot: We aim to get a rating of less than 3.
64 +1. Humaness of the robot: We aim to get a rating of less than 3.
65 +1. TBD
64 64  )))
65 65  |(((
66 66  
... ... @@ -90,5 +90,7 @@
90 90  
91 91   5. There would be a button on the screen displaying a statement like "Click here to make me act more human", which would keep a count of how many times the button was pressed.
92 92  
95 + 6. TBD
96 +
93 93  
94 94  )))