Skip to Content

Changes for page Deepali - Self Reflection

Last modified by Deepali Prabhu on 2023/04/09 15:29
From version 3.1
edited by Deepali Prabhu
on 2023/02/27 23:47
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 4.1
edited by Deepali Prabhu
on 2023/03/13 16:10
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -7,4 +7,24 @@
7 7  
8 8  During the Lab session, we discussed and settled on the final scope of our agents and its use cases. We eliminated more generic use cases for our agent such as health monitoring and decided to scope down the use cases of our agent to just assisting the PwD with painting and using information from the session to enhance interaction between and PwD and his daughter.
9 9  
10 -
10 +
11 +== Week 3 ==
12 +
13 +* Understood the various Human Factors to consider as the foundation to design.
14 +* Read papers to come up with relevant socio cognitive principles to make the robot applicable. 
15 +** Saw that self determination theory is a good foundation to assist the PwD given our goals.
16 +** Researched on various robots built for art and the design principles they use. Not many robots assist users in paining. There are generic assistive technology but nothing that helps disabled personnel.
17 +** Synchronization of tasks and thoughts between PwD and robot is important hence added two principles for it.
18 +* Worked on building a foundation for evaluation.
19 +** The DECIDE framework was great help to systematically come up with the evaluation framework. It allowed us to systematically look for and select effective metrics and evaluation approaches.
20 +** After research realized that generic attitude towards robots is also an important aspect to consider.
21 +** Since we have personalization involved, will need to see how to handle.
22 +
23 +Worked with my team mates to summarize and present the first iteration of our group presentation
24 +
25 +== Week 4 ==
26 +
27 +Started looking into further evaluation frameworks and metrics. Several papers exhibit scales and methods to evaluate a social robot, however since we will be using proxy participants to evaluate our robot further research is necessary to come up with the specifics.
28 +
29 +
30 +== ==