Changes for page 3. Human-Robot Collaboration
Last modified by Valentijn van de Beek on 2023/04/10 00:11
From version 2.3
edited by Valentijn van de Beek
on 2023/04/10 00:02
on 2023/04/10 00:02
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
To version 2.2
edited by Valentijn van de Beek
on 2023/04/09 23:55
on 2023/04/09 23:55
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ 6 6 7 7 * //Daniel Woods, Fengpei Yuan, Ying-Ling Jao, and Xiaopeng Zhao. 2021. Social Robots for Older Adults with Dementia: A Narrative Review on Challenges & Future Directions. In Social Robotics: 13th International Conference, ICSR 2021, Singapore, Singapore, November 10–13, 2021, Proceedings. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 411–420. [[https:~~/~~/doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90525-5_35>>https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90525-5_35]]// 8 8 9 -Social robot can improve social engagement, attention, neuropsychiatric symptions, reduce agitation, stress, increase neuron activity and decrease depression. One interface which could be applied are speaking agents such as Siri or Alexa. A Social Assistive Robot SAR is able to provide companionship, monitor health, simulate and provide therapy. The vast majority (> 80%) of the PwD and elderly are willing to take a SAR home and a similar percentage (> 75%) of caretakers would entrust someone to a SAR. Ethical concerns about reduced human interaction, loss of privacy, mismatched expectations and attachment to robots do exist however. Papers target companionship (41%),cognitivesimulation (35%), monitoring (14%) and support for their impairment (10%). 60% of studied used small samples sizes and only ~~15% of speech interfaces had a sample size larger than 40.All of those, however, where only runasone ortwo sessions. 40% of studies wheredone in a real-worldsetting (i.e. home orcare centre)Only two large scale, real-world studies where conducted. Most paper where just proof-of-concepts where tests where run for a limited time, with a few sessions, low robot autonomy or in lab settings.9 +Social robot can improve social engagement, attention, neuropsychiatric symptions, reduce agitation, stress, increase neuron activity and decrease depression. One interface which could be applied are speaking agents such as Siri or Alexa. A Social Assistive Robot SAR is able to provide companionship, monitor health, simulate and provide therapy. The vast majority (> 80%) of the PwD and elderly are willing to take a SAR home and a similar percentage (> 75%) of caretakers would entrust someone to a SAR. Ethical concerns about reduced human interaction, loss of privacy, mismatched expectations and attachment to robots do exist however. Since 2000 a trend can be seen 10 10 11 11 * M. R. Lima et al., "Conversational Affective Social Robots for Ageing and Dementia Support," in IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 1378-1397, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1109/TCDS.2021.3115228. 12 12