Changes for page 3. Human-Robot Collaboration
Last modified by Valentijn van de Beek on 2023/04/10 00:11
From version 1.3
edited by Valentijn van de Beek
on 2023/04/04 22:42
on 2023/04/04 22:42
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
To version 1.4
edited by Valentijn van de Beek
on 2023/04/04 23:19
on 2023/04/04 23:19
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -5,10 +5,19 @@ 5 5 6 6 7 7 Daniel Woods, Fengpei Yuan, Ying-Ling Jao, and Xiaopeng Zhao. 2021. Social Robots for Older Adults with Dementia: A Narrative Review on Challenges & Future Directions. In Social Robotics: 13th International Conference, ICSR 2021, Singapore, Singapore, November 10–13, 2021, Proceedings. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 411–420. [[https:~~/~~/doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90525-5_35>>https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90525-5_35]] 8 -\\M. R. Lima et al., "Conversational Affective Social Robots for Ageing and Dementia Support," in IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 1378-1397, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1109/TCDS.2021.3115228. 9 9 10 -M. Schrum, C. H. Park and A. Howard, "Humanoid Therapy Robot for Encouraging Exercise in Dementia Patients," 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), Daegu, Korea (South), 2019, pp. 564-565, doi: 10.1109/HRI.2019.8673155. 9 + 10 +M. R. Lima et al., "Conversational Affective Social Robots for Ageing and Dementia Support," in IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 1378-1397, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1109/TCDS.2021.3115228. 11 + 12 + 11 11 \\\\\\Mikaela Law, Ho Seok Ahn, Bruce MacDonald, Dina-Sara Vasjakovic, JongYoon Lim, Min Ho Lee, Craig Sutherland, Kathy Peri, Ngaire Kerse, and Elizabeth Broadbent. 2019. User Testing of Cognitive Training Games for People with Mild Cognitive Impairment: Design Implications. In Social Robotics: 11th International Conference, ICSR 2019, Madrid, Spain, November 26–29, 2019, Proceedings. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 464–473. https:~/~/doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35888-4_43 12 -\\Lizzy Sinnema and Maryam Alimardani. 2019. The Attitude of Elderly and Young Adults Towards a Humanoid Robot as a Facilitator for Social Interaction. In Social Robotics: 11th International Conference, ICSR 2019, Madrid, Spain, November 26–29, 2019, Proceedings. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 24–33. https:~/~/doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35888-4_3 14 + 15 +One of the primary problems in care homes is the feeling in lonely in elderly. Social interaction is an important method to reduce loneliness, but is hard to achieve in care homes. Animal robots have shown promise in this area, however lack the depth of real conversation. On the other hand, for that level of Human-Robot Interaction much more complicated natural language processing, text-to-speech and dialogue management technologies must be created than the current state of the art. Robots should not replace human care, however and instead augment it. 16 + 17 +This study measures the attitude of young and old people towards the Nao social robot. It had 65 Dutch participants of which 24 where seniors and 28 students. The goal of the robot interactions was to increase interaction of participants between each other, this is done by the robot introducing a puzzle and only further engaging if they asked for a hint or repeat the riddle. 18 +\\For both groups the level of anxiety has gone down significantly. Elderly perceived the robot as similarly useful, while students saw it as less useful. This could be explained by a different set of needs: elderly expect a robot to perform more communicative tasks while young adults prefer a robot that does physical tasks. Elderly are typically positive about the interaction had with the robot. All participants felt comfortable with each other participating in the experiment. Elderly preferred one-on-one interactions and wanted continued interaction with the robot. After the experiment concluded participants continued conversations about robots or similar topics indicating that social robots may be a useful tool in augmenting human conversation rather than replacing it 19 + 20 + 21 +Lizzy Sinnema and Maryam Alimardani. 2019. The Attitude of Elderly and Young Adults Towards a Humanoid Robot as a Facilitator for Social Interaction. In Social Robotics: 11th International Conference, ICSR 2019, Madrid, Spain, November 26–29, 2019, Proceedings. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 24–33. https:~/~/doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35888-4_3 13 13 \\Yu C, Sommerlad A, Sakure L, Livingston G. Socially assistive robots for people with dementia: Systematic review and meta-analysis of feasibility, acceptability and the effect on cognition, neuropsychiatric symptoms and quality of life. Ageing Res Rev. 2022 Jun;78:101633. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2022.101633. Epub 2022 Apr 21. PMID: 35462001. 14 14 \\Hendrix, J., Feng, Y., Van Otterdijk, M., & Barakova, E. I. (2019). Adding a Context: Will It Influence Human-Robot Interaction of People Living with Dementia? //Lecture Notes in Computer Science//. https:~/~/doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35888-4_46