Skip to Content

Changes for page 4. Evaluation Methods

Last modified by Demi Tao on 2023/04/10 10:21
From version 1.2
edited by Mark Neerincx
on 2023/03/23 15:41
Change comment: Added comment
To version 2.1
edited by Valentijn van de Beek
on 2023/04/04 22:23
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -xwiki:XWiki.MarkNeerincx
1 +XWiki.vvandebeek
Content
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,3 @@
1 +"Because conducting a survey study with individuals with dementia is more difficult, many of these studies examined caregivers’ opinions instead, as the proxy of individuals with dementia [54]. The survey was conducted in a structured and/or less-structured way [12, 14], the latter one allowing the users to answer in an open-ended format. A limitation to this is that qualitative research is difficult to generate concrete results, with significant interpretation of responses being required. Several studies focusing on the use of social robots for older adults with cognitive impairment heavily relied on caregiver review, depending on the severity of the user’s impairment [54]. In one study, a teleoperated robot\ was used to assess the worsening or stabilization of user’s symptoms given interaction with the robot operated by different personnel, finding the severe dementia symptoms for some users did not worsen following the interaction" - Daniel et al
2 +
3 +Daniel Woods, Fengpei Yuan, Ying-Ling Jao, and Xiaopeng Zhao. 2021. Social Robots for Older Adults with Dementia: A Narrative Review on Challenges & Future Directions. In Social Robotics: 13th International Conference, ICSR 2021, Singapore, Singapore, November 10–13, 2021, Proceedings. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 411–420. [[https:~~/~~/doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90525-5_35>>url:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90525-5_35]]