Changes for page b. Test

Last modified by Demi Tao on 2023/04/10 10:13

From version 8.3
edited by Demi Tao
on 2023/04/07 17:08
Change comment: Deleted object
To version 8.1
edited by Demi Tao
on 2023/04/07 17:00
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

XWiki.XWikiComments[6]
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -XWiki.DemiTao
Comment
... ... @@ -1,16 +1,0 @@
1 -**Interpretation for user evaluation **
2 -
3 -If a respondent had a minimum total score of 60% (15 out of 25 for the matrix question) or more, he or she was considered to be satisfied with the application.
4 -
5 -**Scoring SUS**
6 -
7 -* For odd items: subtract one from the user response.
8 -* For even-numbered items: subtract the user responses from 5
9 -* This scales all values from 0 to 4 (with four being the most positive response).
10 -* Add up the converted responses for each user and multiply that total by 2.5. This converts the range of possible values from 0 to 100 instead of from 0 to 40.
11 -
12 -**Interpreting Scores for SUS [[*>>https://measuringu.com/sus/]]**
13 -
14 -Interpreting scoring can be complex. The participant’s scores for each question are converted to a new number, added together and then multiplied by 2.5 to convert the original scores of 0-40 to 0-100.  Though the scores are 0-100, these are not percentages and should be considered only in terms of their percentile ranking.
15 -
16 -Based on research, a SUS score above a 68 would be considered above average and anything below 68 is below average, however, the best way to interpret your results involves “normalizing” the scores to produce a percentile ranking.
Date
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -2023-04-07 17:01:06.25
XWiki.XWikiComments[0]
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.DemiTao
Comment
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,3 @@
1 +The survey can be designed based on UTAUT questionnaire (performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, facilitating conditions) to test usability and user experience.
2 +
3 +Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. //MIS Quarterly//, //27//(3), 425–478. https:~/~/doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Date
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +2023-03-23 09:22:38.687