Skip to Content

Changes for page b. Test

Last modified by Demi Tao on 2023/04/10 10:13
From version 2.2
edited by Arber Demi
on 2023/03/25 17:05
Change comment: (Autosaved)
To version 3.1
edited by Arber Demi
on 2023/03/25 17:08
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -2,8 +2,10 @@
2 2  
3 3  <include a short summary of the claims to be tested, i.e., the effects of the functions in a specfic use case>
4 4  
5 -<nothing
5 +<nothing on prototype yet, we really need to get that going, but assuming this information>
6 6  
7 +In the section [[a. Prototype>>3\. Evaluation.a\. Prototype.WebHome]] two versions of the robot were presented, one with voice functionality and one without.
8 +
7 7  The main claims we are looking to test with this testing procedure are related to the functionality and usability of the robot.
8 8  
9 9  The participants will be other students taking the course. The participants will be placed in the shoes of a PwD and be tasked with completing several basic actions with the robot while impaired in several known ways to simulate the difficulties of a PwD.
... ... @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
22 22  
23 23  == 2.2 Experimental design ==
24 24  
25 -For the experiment, we used a within-subject design. All of the participants interacted with both versions of the robot, with half of the participants interacting with version 1 first and then version 2, and the other half in reverse order. This was done to counter-balance the carryover effects.
27 +<Here we can do between or within, doesn't really matter, depends on the number of people we evaluate on honestly because less people means that between subject results will be much more varied and therefore more stupid, not that they will make any sense anyway>
26 26  
27 27  == 2.3 Tasks ==
28 28