Skip to Content

Changes for page b. Test

Last modified by Demi Tao on 2023/04/10 10:13
From version 2.1
edited by Demi Tao
on 2023/03/24 12:08
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 1.2
edited by Demi Tao
on 2023/03/23 09:22
Change comment: Added comment

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -5,11 +5,9 @@
5 5  
6 6  = 2. Method =
7 7  
8 -The prototypes are evaluated in a simulated manner, with participants pretending to be PwDs and conducting in-person experiments.
9 9  
10 10  == 2.1 Participants ==
11 11  
12 -All students in CS4235 Socio-Cognitive Engineering (2022-2023) in TU Delft are invited to test the robot. In the end, X students are presented.
13 13  
14 14  == 2.2 Experimental design ==
15 15  
... ... @@ -16,83 +16,13 @@
16 16  
17 17  == 2.3 Tasks ==
18 18  
19 -In the user test, the following tasks were asked of the participants:
20 20  
21 -==== Reminders for activities ====
22 -
23 -* (((
24 -Add a reminder that a relative will pay a visit tomorrow with the format as "sb. will come at 10 am on Friday". Set the reminder to remind you 10 min before that.
25 -)))
26 -* (((
27 -Add a reminder USING A VOICE COMMAND that today at 2 pm will have a general health checkup.
28 -)))
29 -* (((
30 -Check the reminders you have added for today and tomorrow.
31 -)))
32 -
33 -==== Personal profile ====
34 -
35 -* (((
36 -Add relatives as a contact in the "profile" section.
37 -)))
38 -
39 -==== Memory games ====
40 -
41 -* (((
42 -Go to the Games section and check what is included there.
43 -)))
44 -
45 -==== Medicine reminders ====
46 -
47 -(for professional caregivers, write it just in case)
48 -
49 -* (((
50 -In the section “My Health”, add a medicine reminder to take the medicine **Donepezil**, 1 time per day at 9 PM before going to bed.
51 -)))
52 -* (((
53 -Check medicines that have been added.
54 -)))
55 -* (((
56 -Delete medicines that have been added.
57 -)))
58 -
59 -==== About dementia ====
60 -
61 -* (((
62 -Go to the About dementia section and check the information provided.
63 -)))
64 -* (((
65 -Click on the different chapters and have a look at them.
66 -)))
67 -
68 -==== General tasks ====
69 -
70 -* (((
71 -Turn on the robot.
72 -)))
73 -
74 74  == 2.4 Measures ==
75 75  
76 -Quantitative measures are used in a user evaluation.  If a respondent had a minimum total score of 60% or more, he or she was considered to be satisfied with the application.
77 77  
78 78  == 2.5 Procedure ==
79 79  
80 80  
81 -The procedure was conducted as follows:
82 -
83 -1. Welcome participants and give an introduction.
84 -1. Get them to sign a consent form.
85 -1. Prepare them to pretend to be a person with dementia. *
86 -1. Have interaction with the robot and complete the tasks.
87 -1. Complete a questionnaire.
88 -1. Have a short interview with selected participants. (if possible, 2 participants)
89 -
90 -//* Several fingers taped together (to simulate PwD's inability to control movements flexibly);//
91 -
92 -// Wearing very dirty glasses (simulates blurred vision and degraded perception);//
93 -
94 -// Wearing headphones that broadcast murmurs (simulating hearing degradation and the noisy environment).//
95 -
96 96  == 2.6 Material ==
97 97  
98 98  
XWiki.XWikiComments[1]
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Anonymous
Comment
... ... @@ -1,40 +1,0 @@
1 -Quintana et al. (2020) designed questions based on the most important quality attributes to evaluate how the application works for people with mild cognitive impairment.
2 -
3 -(potential questions tailored to our case)
4 -
5 -* (((
6 -How satisfied are you with the robot’s possibility to support you?
7 -)))
8 -* (((
9 -How well does the robot fulfill your expectations?
10 -)))
11 -* (((
12 -Imagine a perfect robot for this task. How far away from it is the robot you are using today?
13 -)))
14 -* (((
15 -I find the robot easily accessible for people with dementia.
16 -)))
17 -* (((
18 -I feel that I can trust the robot and that it is safe to use.
19 -)))
20 -* (((
21 -I find it easy to understand how to operate the robot.
22 -)))
23 -* (((
24 -I am able to understand all the information presented by the robot.
25 -)))
26 -* (((
27 -I feel that the robot gave me better control over my daily situation.
28 -)))
29 -
30 -The alternatives the users could give to all the above were the following: 1 = Strongly disagree; 2 = Disagree.; 3 = Neither agree nor disagree; 4 = Agree; 5 = Strongly agree.
31 -
32 -
33 -The System Usability Scale (SUS) is a dependable instrument for testing usability. It comprises of 10 questions with five response options which range from strongly agree to strongly disagree for responders (Jordan et al., 1996).
34 -
35 -(see the attachment for the 10 questions)
36 -
37 -
38 -1. Quintana M, Anderberg P, Sanmartin Berglund J, Frögren J, Cano N, Cellek S, Zhang J, Garolera M. Feasibility-Usability Study of a Tablet App Adapted Specifically for Persons with Cognitive Impairment—SMART4MD (Support Monitoring and Reminder Technology for Mild Dementia). //International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health//. 2020; 17(18):6816. [[https:~~/~~/doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186816>>https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186816]]
39 -
40 -2. Brooke, J. SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. //Usability Eval. Ind. **1996**, 189//, 4–7.
Date
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -2023-03-24 11:18:20.296