Summary
-
Page properties (2 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
-
Objects (0 modified, 0 added, 2 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -XWiki. DemiTao1 +xwiki:XWiki.RuuddeJong - Content
-
... ... @@ -5,11 +5,9 @@ 5 5 6 6 = 2. Method = 7 7 8 -The prototypes are evaluated in a simulated manner, with participants pretending to be PwDs and conducting in-person experiments. 9 9 10 10 == 2.1 Participants == 11 11 12 -All students in CS4235 Socio-Cognitive Engineering (2022-2023) in TU Delft are invited to test the robot. In the end, X students are presented. 13 13 14 14 == 2.2 Experimental design == 15 15 ... ... @@ -16,83 +16,13 @@ 16 16 17 17 == 2.3 Tasks == 18 18 19 -In the user test, the following tasks were asked of the participants: 20 20 21 -==== Reminders for activities ==== 22 - 23 -* ((( 24 -Add a reminder that a relative will pay a visit tomorrow with the format as "sb. will come at 10 am on Friday". Set the reminder to remind you 10 min before that. 25 -))) 26 -* ((( 27 -Add a reminder USING A VOICE COMMAND that today at 2 pm will have a general health checkup. 28 -))) 29 -* ((( 30 -Check the reminders you have added for today and tomorrow. 31 -))) 32 - 33 -==== Personal profile ==== 34 - 35 -* ((( 36 -Add relatives as a contact in the "profile" section. 37 -))) 38 - 39 -==== Memory games ==== 40 - 41 -* ((( 42 -Go to the Games section and check what is included there. 43 -))) 44 - 45 -==== Medicine reminders ==== 46 - 47 -(for professional caregivers, write it just in case) 48 - 49 -* ((( 50 -In the section “My Health”, add a medicine reminder to take the medicine **Donepezil**, 1 time per day at 9 PM before going to bed. 51 -))) 52 -* ((( 53 -Check medicines that have been added. 54 -))) 55 -* ((( 56 -Delete medicines that have been added. 57 -))) 58 - 59 -==== About dementia ==== 60 - 61 -* ((( 62 -Go to the About dementia section and check the information provided. 63 -))) 64 -* ((( 65 -Click on the different chapters and have a look at them. 66 -))) 67 - 68 -==== General tasks ==== 69 - 70 -* ((( 71 -Turn on the robot. 72 -))) 73 - 74 74 == 2.4 Measures == 75 75 76 -Quantitative measures are used in a user evaluation. If a respondent had a minimum total score of 60% or more, he or she was considered to be satisfied with the application. 77 77 78 78 == 2.5 Procedure == 79 79 80 80 81 -The procedure was conducted as follows: 82 - 83 -1. Welcome participants and give an introduction. 84 -1. Get them to sign a consent form. 85 -1. Prepare them to pretend to be a person with dementia. * 86 -1. Have interaction with the robot and complete the tasks. 87 -1. Complete a questionnaire. 88 -1. Have a short interview with selected participants. (if possible, 2 participants) 89 - 90 -//* Several fingers taped together (to simulate PwD's inability to control movements flexibly);// 91 - 92 -// Wearing very dirty glasses (simulates blurred vision and degraded perception);// 93 - 94 -// Wearing headphones that broadcast murmurs (simulating hearing degradation and the noisy environment).// 95 - 96 96 == 2.6 Material == 97 97 98 98
- XWiki.XWikiComments[0]
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -XWiki.DemiTao - Comment
-
... ... @@ -1,3 +1,0 @@ 1 -The survey can be designed based on UTAUT questionnaire (performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, facilitating conditions) to test usability and user experience. 2 - 3 -Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. //MIS Quarterly//, //27//(3), 425–478. https:~/~/doi.org/10.2307/30036540 - Date
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2023-03-23 09:22:38.687
- XWiki.XWikiComments[1]
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Anonymous - Comment
-
... ... @@ -1,40 +1,0 @@ 1 -Quintana et al. (2020) designed questions based on the most important quality attributes to evaluate how the application works for people with mild cognitive impairment. 2 - 3 -(potential questions tailored to our case) 4 - 5 -* ((( 6 -How satisfied are you with the robot’s possibility to support you? 7 -))) 8 -* ((( 9 -How well does the robot fulfill your expectations? 10 -))) 11 -* ((( 12 -Imagine a perfect robot for this task. How far away from it is the robot you are using today? 13 -))) 14 -* ((( 15 -I find the robot easily accessible for people with dementia. 16 -))) 17 -* ((( 18 -I feel that I can trust the robot and that it is safe to use. 19 -))) 20 -* ((( 21 -I find it easy to understand how to operate the robot. 22 -))) 23 -* ((( 24 -I am able to understand all the information presented by the robot. 25 -))) 26 -* ((( 27 -I feel that the robot gave me better control over my daily situation. 28 -))) 29 - 30 -The alternatives the users could give to all the above were the following: 1 = Strongly disagree; 2 = Disagree.; 3 = Neither agree nor disagree; 4 = Agree; 5 = Strongly agree. 31 - 32 - 33 -The System Usability Scale (SUS) is a dependable instrument for testing usability. It comprises of 10 questions with five response options which range from strongly agree to strongly disagree for responders (Jordan et al., 1996). 34 - 35 -(see the attachment for the 10 questions) 36 - 37 - 38 -1. Quintana M, Anderberg P, Sanmartin Berglund J, Frögren J, Cano N, Cellek S, Zhang J, Garolera M. Feasibility-Usability Study of a Tablet App Adapted Specifically for Persons with Cognitive Impairment—SMART4MD (Support Monitoring and Reminder Technology for Mild Dementia). //International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health//. 2020; 17(18):6816. [[https:~~/~~/doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186816>>https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186816]] 39 - 40 -2. Brooke, J. SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. //Usability Eval. Ind. **1996**, 189//, 4–7. - Date
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2023-03-24 11:18:20.296