Skip to Content

Changes for page b. Test

Last modified by Demi Tao on 2023/04/10 10:13
From version 19.1
edited by Karthik Prakash
on 2023/04/08 10:26
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 18.1
edited by Demi Tao
on 2023/04/08 01:17
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -XWiki.KarthikPrakash
1 +XWiki.DemiTao
Content
... ... @@ -109,9 +109,9 @@
109 109  
110 110  |=(% style="width: 199px;" %)Tasks|=(% style="width: 147px;" %)Succeeded by Themselves|=(% style="width: 146px;" %)Succeeded with Some Guidance|=(% style="width: 185px;" %)Succeeded with Detailed Explicit Instructions|=(% style="width: 175px;" %)Average Time to Complete Task (s)
111 111  |(% style="width:199px" %)Add a reminder|(% style="width:147px" %)14.29%|(% style="width:146px" %)28.57%|(% style="width:185px" %)57.14%|(% style="width:175px" %)97
112 -|(% style="width:199px" %)Check weekly remainders on the Calendar page|(% style="width:147px" %)100%|(% style="width:146px" %)0%|(% style="width:185px" %)NA|(% style="width:175px" %)36
112 +|(% style="width:199px" %)Check weekly remainders on the Calendar page|(% style="width:147px" %)100%|(% style="width:146px" %)0%|(% style="width:185px" %)0%|(% style="width:175px" %)36
113 113  |(% style="width:199px" %)Create a personal profile|(% style="width:147px" %)7.14%|(% style="width:146px" %)50%|(% style="width:185px" %)42.86%|(% style="width:175px" %)69
114 -|(% style="width:199px" %)Verify current profiles|(% style="width:147px" %)85.71%|(% style="width:146px" %)14.29%|(% style="width:185px" %)NA|(% style="width:175px" %)32
114 +|(% style="width:199px" %)Verify current profiles|(% style="width:147px" %)85.71%|(% style="width:146px" %)14.29%|(% style="width:185px" %)0%|(% style="width:175px" %)32
115 115  |(% style="width:199px" %)Play memory game|(% style="width:147px" %)0%|(% style="width:146px" %)42.86%|(% style="width:185px" %)57.14%|(% style="width:175px" %)208
116 116  
117 117  |(% style="width:330px" %)**Tasks**|(% style="width:523px" %)**Parts where people struggled**
XWiki.XWikiComments[1]
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Anonymous
Comment
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,40 @@
1 +Quintana et al. (2020) designed questions based on the most important quality attributes to evaluate how the application works for people with mild cognitive impairment.
2 +
3 +(potential questions tailored to our case)
4 +
5 +* (((
6 +How satisfied are you with the robot’s possibility to support you?
7 +)))
8 +* (((
9 +How well does the robot fulfill your expectations?
10 +)))
11 +* (((
12 +Imagine a perfect robot for this task. How far away from it is the robot you are using today?
13 +)))
14 +* (((
15 +I find the robot easily accessible for people with dementia.
16 +)))
17 +* (((
18 +I feel that I can trust the robot and that it is safe to use.
19 +)))
20 +* (((
21 +I find it easy to understand how to operate the robot.
22 +)))
23 +* (((
24 +I am able to understand all the information presented by the robot.
25 +)))
26 +* (((
27 +I feel that the robot gave me better control over my daily situation.
28 +)))
29 +
30 +The alternatives the users could give to all the above were the following: 1 = Strongly disagree; 2 = Disagree.; 3 = Neither agree nor disagree; 4 = Agree; 5 = Strongly agree.
31 +
32 +
33 +The System Usability Scale (SUS) is a dependable instrument for testing usability. It comprises of 10 questions with five response options which range from strongly agree to strongly disagree for responders (Jordan et al., 1996).
34 +
35 +(see the attachment for the 10 questions)
36 +
37 +
38 +1. Quintana M, Anderberg P, Sanmartin Berglund J, Frögren J, Cano N, Cellek S, Zhang J, Garolera M. Feasibility-Usability Study of a Tablet App Adapted Specifically for Persons with Cognitive Impairment—SMART4MD (Support Monitoring and Reminder Technology for Mild Dementia). //International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health//. 2020; 17(18):6816. [[https:~~/~~/doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186816>>https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186816]]
39 +
40 +2. Brooke, J. SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. //Usability Eval. Ind. **1996**, 189//, 4–7.
Date
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +2023-03-24 11:18:20.296
XWiki.XWikiComments[6]
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.DemiTao
Comment
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,16 @@
1 +**Interpretation for user evaluation **
2 +
3 +If a respondent had a minimum total score of 60% (15 out of 25 for the matrix question) or more, he or she was considered to be satisfied with the application.
4 +
5 +**Scoring SUS**
6 +
7 +* For odd items: subtract one from the user response.
8 +* For even-numbered items: subtract the user responses from 5
9 +* This scales all values from 0 to 4 (with four being the most positive response).
10 +* Add up the converted responses for each user and multiply that total by 2.5. This converts the range of possible values from 0 to 100 instead of from 0 to 40.
11 +
12 +**Interpreting Scores for SUS [[*>>https://measuringu.com/sus/]]**
13 +
14 +Interpreting scoring can be complex. The participant’s scores for each question are converted to a new number, added together and then multiplied by 2.5 to convert the original scores of 0-40 to 0-100.  Though the scores are 0-100, these are not percentages and should be considered only in terms of their percentile ranking.
15 +
16 +Based on research, a SUS score above a 68 would be considered above average and anything below 68 is below average, however, the best way to interpret your results involves “normalizing” the scores to produce a percentile ranking.
Date
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +2023-04-07 17:01:06.25