Summary
-
Page properties (2 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
-
Objects (0 modified, 2 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 - xwiki:XWiki.RuuddeJong1 +XWiki.DemiTao - Content
-
... ... @@ -5,9 +5,11 @@ 5 5 6 6 = 2. Method = 7 7 8 +The prototypes are evaluated in a simulated manner, with participants pretending to be PwDs and conducting in-person experiments. 8 8 9 9 == 2.1 Participants == 10 10 12 +All students in CS4235 Socio-Cognitive Engineering (2022-2023) in TU Delft are invited to test the robot. In the end, X students are presented. 11 11 12 12 == 2.2 Experimental design == 13 13 ... ... @@ -14,13 +14,83 @@ 14 14 15 15 == 2.3 Tasks == 16 16 19 +In the user test, the following tasks were asked of the participants: 17 17 21 +==== Reminders for activities ==== 22 + 23 +* ((( 24 +Add a reminder that a relative will pay a visit tomorrow with the format as "sb. will come at 10 am on Friday". Set the reminder to remind you 10 min before that. 25 +))) 26 +* ((( 27 +Add a reminder USING A VOICE COMMAND that today at 2 pm will have a general health checkup. 28 +))) 29 +* ((( 30 +Check the reminders you have added for today and tomorrow. 31 +))) 32 + 33 +==== Personal profile ==== 34 + 35 +* ((( 36 +Add relatives as a contact in the "profile" section. 37 +))) 38 + 39 +==== Memory games ==== 40 + 41 +* ((( 42 +Go to the Games section and check what is included there. 43 +))) 44 + 45 +==== Medicine reminders ==== 46 + 47 +(for professional caregivers, write it just in case) 48 + 49 +* ((( 50 +In the section “My Health”, add a medicine reminder to take the medicine **Donepezil**, 1 time per day at 9 PM before going to bed. 51 +))) 52 +* ((( 53 +Check medicines that have been added. 54 +))) 55 +* ((( 56 +Delete medicines that have been added. 57 +))) 58 + 59 +==== About dementia ==== 60 + 61 +* ((( 62 +Go to the About dementia section and check the information provided. 63 +))) 64 +* ((( 65 +Click on the different chapters and have a look at them. 66 +))) 67 + 68 +==== General tasks ==== 69 + 70 +* ((( 71 +Turn on the robot. 72 +))) 73 + 18 18 == 2.4 Measures == 19 19 76 +Quantitative measures are used in a user evaluation. If a respondent had a minimum total score of 60% or more, he or she was considered to be satisfied with the application. 20 20 21 21 == 2.5 Procedure == 22 22 23 23 81 +The procedure was conducted as follows: 82 + 83 +1. Welcome participants and give an introduction. 84 +1. Get them to sign a consent form. 85 +1. Prepare them to pretend to be a person with dementia. * 86 +1. Have interaction with the robot and complete the tasks. 87 +1. Complete a questionnaire. 88 +1. Have a short interview with selected participants. (if possible, 2 participants) 89 + 90 +//* Several fingers taped together (to simulate PwD's inability to control movements flexibly);// 91 + 92 +// Wearing very dirty glasses (simulates blurred vision and degraded perception);// 93 + 94 +// Wearing headphones that broadcast murmurs (simulating hearing degradation and the noisy environment).// 95 + 24 24 == 2.6 Material == 25 25 26 26
- XWiki.XWikiComments[0]
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +XWiki.DemiTao - Comment
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,3 @@ 1 +The survey can be designed based on UTAUT questionnaire (performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, facilitating conditions) to test usability and user experience. 2 + 3 +Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. //MIS Quarterly//, //27//(3), 425–478. https:~/~/doi.org/10.2307/30036540 - Date
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2023-03-23 09:22:38.687
- XWiki.XWikiComments[1]
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Anonymous - Comment
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,40 @@ 1 +Quintana et al. (2020) designed questions based on the most important quality attributes to evaluate how the application works for people with mild cognitive impairment. 2 + 3 +(potential questions tailored to our case) 4 + 5 +* ((( 6 +How satisfied are you with the robot’s possibility to support you? 7 +))) 8 +* ((( 9 +How well does the robot fulfill your expectations? 10 +))) 11 +* ((( 12 +Imagine a perfect robot for this task. How far away from it is the robot you are using today? 13 +))) 14 +* ((( 15 +I find the robot easily accessible for people with dementia. 16 +))) 17 +* ((( 18 +I feel that I can trust the robot and that it is safe to use. 19 +))) 20 +* ((( 21 +I find it easy to understand how to operate the robot. 22 +))) 23 +* ((( 24 +I am able to understand all the information presented by the robot. 25 +))) 26 +* ((( 27 +I feel that the robot gave me better control over my daily situation. 28 +))) 29 + 30 +The alternatives the users could give to all the above were the following: 1 = Strongly disagree; 2 = Disagree.; 3 = Neither agree nor disagree; 4 = Agree; 5 = Strongly agree. 31 + 32 + 33 +The System Usability Scale (SUS) is a dependable instrument for testing usability. It comprises of 10 questions with five response options which range from strongly agree to strongly disagree for responders (Jordan et al., 1996). 34 + 35 +(see the attachment for the 10 questions) 36 + 37 + 38 +1. Quintana M, Anderberg P, Sanmartin Berglund J, Frögren J, Cano N, Cellek S, Zhang J, Garolera M. Feasibility-Usability Study of a Tablet App Adapted Specifically for Persons with Cognitive Impairment—SMART4MD (Support Monitoring and Reminder Technology for Mild Dementia). //International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health//. 2020; 17(18):6816. [[https:~~/~~/doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186816>>https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186816]] 39 + 40 +2. Brooke, J. SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. //Usability Eval. Ind. **1996**, 189//, 4–7. - Date
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2023-03-24 11:18:20.296