Skip to Content

Changes for page b. Test

Last modified by Demi Tao on 2023/04/10 10:13
From version 1.1
edited by Ruud de Jong
on 2023/02/13 10:57
Change comment: Imported from XAR
To version 1.3
edited by XWikiGuest
on 2023/03/24 11:18
Change comment: Added comment

Summary

Details

Page properties
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -xwiki:XWiki.RuuddeJong
1 +XWiki.XWikiGuest
XWiki.XWikiComments[0]
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.DemiTao
Comment
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,3 @@
1 +The survey can be designed based on UTAUT questionnaire (performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, facilitating conditions) to test usability and user experience.
2 +
3 +Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. //MIS Quarterly//, //27//(3), 425–478. https:~/~/doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Date
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +2023-03-23 09:22:38.687
XWiki.XWikiComments[1]
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Anonymous
Comment
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,40 @@
1 +Quintana et al. (2020) designed questions based on the most important quality attributes to evaluate how the application works for people with mild cognitive impairment.
2 +
3 +(potential questions tailored to our case)
4 +
5 +* (((
6 +How satisfied are you with the robot’s possibility to support you?
7 +)))
8 +* (((
9 +How well does the robot fulfill your expectations?
10 +)))
11 +* (((
12 +Imagine a perfect robot for this task. How far away from it is the robot you are using today?
13 +)))
14 +* (((
15 +I find the robot easily accessible for people with dementia.
16 +)))
17 +* (((
18 +I feel that I can trust the robot and that it is safe to use.
19 +)))
20 +* (((
21 +I find it easy to understand how to operate the robot.
22 +)))
23 +* (((
24 +I am able to understand all the information presented by the robot.
25 +)))
26 +* (((
27 +I feel that the robot gave me better control over my daily situation.
28 +)))
29 +
30 +The alternatives the users could give to all the above were the following: 1 = Strongly disagree; 2 = Disagree.; 3 = Neither agree nor disagree; 4 = Agree; 5 = Strongly agree.
31 +
32 +
33 +The System Usability Scale (SUS) is a dependable instrument for testing usability. It comprises of 10 questions with five response options which range from strongly agree to strongly disagree for responders (Jordan et al., 1996).
34 +
35 +(see the attachment for the 10 questions)
36 +
37 +
38 +1. Quintana M, Anderberg P, Sanmartin Berglund J, Frögren J, Cano N, Cellek S, Zhang J, Garolera M. Feasibility-Usability Study of a Tablet App Adapted Specifically for Persons with Cognitive Impairment—SMART4MD (Support Monitoring and Reminder Technology for Mild Dementia). //International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health//. 2020; 17(18):6816. [[https:~~/~~/doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186816>>https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186816]]
39 +
40 +2. Brooke, J. SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. //Usability Eval. Ind. **1996**, 189//, 4–7.
Date
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +2023-03-24 11:18:20.296