Hide last authors
| author | version | line-number | content |
|---|---|---|---|
| |
1.2 | 1 | **Week 1:** |
| |
1.3 | 2 | * Find and form the project group, discuss with Cesar about the problem we want to address for the PwD using Robot. |
| |
1.2 | 3 | |
| 4 | **Week 2:** | ||
| 5 | * Group discussion on problem statement and robot | ||
| |
1.4 | 6 | * Worked on the Robot Partner page based on the summary of lecture |
| |
1.2 | 7 | * Collaborated on use cases, scenarios and problem statements |
| 8 | |||
| 9 | **Week 3** | ||
| |
1.4 | 10 | * Worked on the Design Patterns and Ontology page based on the summary of lecture |
| 11 | * Collaborated on thinking of personas | ||
| |
1.2 | 12 | |
| 13 | **Week 4** | ||
| 14 | * Collaborated on functionalities, claims, evaluation and the presentation | ||
| 15 | * Discussed the prototype design | ||
| |
1.4 | 16 | * Worked on the Design Patterns and Ontology page based on the summary of lecture |
| |
1.2 | 17 | * Got familiar with Interactive Robots platform and Choregraphe |
| 18 | |||
| 19 | **Week 5** | ||
| 20 | * Revisited the use cases, functionalities, claims and evaluation based on the presentation session | ||
| 21 | * Further expanded on a demo project with Choregraphe with the help of online tutorials | ||
| 22 | |||
| 23 | **Week 6** | ||
| 24 | * Considered the possibility of addressing inclusivity in the project report | ||
| 25 | * Reconsidered the evaluation framework | ||
| 26 | * Worked on programming with 2 sessions in the lab |