... |
... |
@@ -12,16 +12,21 @@ |
12 |
12 |
* Collaborated on thinking of personas |
13 |
13 |
|
14 |
14 |
**Week 4** |
15 |
|
-* Collaborated on functionalities, claims, evaluation and the presentation |
16 |
|
-* Discussed the prototype design |
|
15 |
+* Collaborated on functionalities, claims, evaluation and prepare the presentation |
|
16 |
+* Collaborated on designing the IDP and TDP |
17 |
17 |
* Worked on the Measuring Instruments page based on the summary of lecture |
18 |
18 |
* Got familiar with Interactive Robots platform and Choregraphe |
19 |
19 |
|
20 |
20 |
**Week 5** |
21 |
|
-* Revisited the use cases, functionalities, claims and evaluation based on the presentation session |
22 |
|
-* Further expanded on a demo project with Choregraphe with the help of online tutorials |
|
21 |
+* Finished the presentation and improved our ideas (use cases, functionalities, claims and evaluation and design pattern) based on the feedback given from the presentation |
|
22 |
+* Studied on how to programming the Pepper with Choregraphe with the help of online tutorials |
|
23 |
+* Collaborated on designing the flow dialog for our use cases |
23 |
23 |
|
24 |
24 |
**Week 6** |
25 |
25 |
* Considered the possibility of addressing inclusivity in the project report |
26 |
|
-* Reconsidered the evaluation framework |
27 |
|
-* Worked on programming with 2 sessions in the lab |
|
27 |
+* Group Worked on programming with 2 different types of Pepper(intelligent and non-intelligent) in the lab |
|
28 |
+ |
|
29 |
+**Week 7** |
|
30 |
+* Collaborated on making the questionnaire and finalize the prototype |
|
31 |
+* Collaborated on evaluating our two version of prototypes with participants and analysed our evaluation results. |
|
32 |
+* Finalize the XWiki based on the received comments from lecturers. |