| ... |
... |
@@ -12,16 +12,16 @@ |
| 12 |
12 |
* Collaborated on thinking of personas |
| 13 |
13 |
|
| 14 |
14 |
**Week 4** |
| 15 |
|
-* Collaborated on functionalities, claims, evaluation and the presentation |
| 16 |
|
-* Discussed the prototype design |
|
15 |
+* Collaborated on functionalities, claims, evaluation and prepare the presentation |
|
16 |
+* Collaborated on designing the IDP and TDP |
| 17 |
17 |
* Worked on the Measuring Instruments page based on the summary of lecture |
| 18 |
18 |
* Got familiar with Interactive Robots platform and Choregraphe |
| 19 |
19 |
|
| 20 |
20 |
**Week 5** |
| 21 |
|
-* Revisited the use cases, functionalities, claims and evaluation based on the presentation session |
| 22 |
|
-* Further expanded on a demo project with Choregraphe with the help of online tutorials |
|
21 |
+* Finished the presentation and improved our ideas (use cases, functionalities, claims and evaluation and design pattern) based on the feedback given from the presentation |
|
22 |
+* Studied on how to programming the Pepper with Choregraphe with the help of online tutorials |
|
23 |
+* Collaborated on designing the flow dialog for our use cases |
| 23 |
23 |
|
| 24 |
24 |
**Week 6** |
| 25 |
25 |
* Considered the possibility of addressing inclusivity in the project report |
| 26 |
|
-* Reconsidered the evaluation framework |
| 27 |
|
-* Worked on programming with 2 sessions in the lab |
|
27 |
+* Group Worked on programming with 2 sessions in the lab |