Changes for page Test
Last modified by Clara Stiller on 2022/04/05 13:44
From version
96.1


edited by Vishruty Mittal
on 2022/04/02 16:12
on 2022/04/02 16:12
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
To version
95.1


edited by Vishruty Mittal
on 2022/04/02 16:11
on 2022/04/02 16:11
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
Details
- Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ 208 208 </td> 209 209 <td> 210 210 We find that the values for co-presence for both conditions are very similar. This may be attributed to the novelty effect and the fact that the face recognition module remains unchanged. 211 -The values for attention allocation are similar, but the controlled flow (design Y) has a higher value. We suspect that the potential reason might be that people start to lose focus with the long conversations. <br>211 +The values for attention allocation are similar, but the controlled flow (design Y) has a higher value. We suspect that the potential reason might be that people start to lose focus with the long conversations. 212 212 213 213 Besides the co-presence, all the observations are not statistically significant because of the high variance in the limited responses. 214 214 ... ... @@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ 226 226 <img src="/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group05/download/Foundation/Operational%20Demands/Personas/WebHome/RelScores.jpg?height=250&rev=1.1" /> 227 227 </td> 228 228 <td> 229 -We achieved a high Cronbatch alpha score (>60%) for almost all the sections of our analysis. Th is thereby providesreliability to our evaluation.229 +We achieved a high Cronbatch alpha score (>60%) for almost all the sections of our analysis. Thereby providing reliability to our evaluation. 230 230 </td> 231 231 </tr> 232 232 </table>