Skip to Content

Changes for page Test

Last modified by Clara Stiller on 2022/04/05 13:44
From version Icon 91.1 Icon
edited by Vishruty Mittal
on 2022/04/02 16:04
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version Icon 94.1 Icon
edited by Vishruty Mittal
on 2022/04/02 16:07
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Icon Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -127,7 +127,7 @@
127 127  <img src="/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group05/download/Foundation/Operational%20Demands/Personas/WebHome/RQ1.jpg?height=250&rev=1.1" />
128 128  </td>
129 129  <td>
130 -We used a Likert scale for this question, 1 being the lowest and 5 being the highest. Participants who interacted with design Y tend to agree less to stay inside compared to the people who interacted with design X.
130 +We used a Likert scale for this question, 1 being the lowest and 5 being the highest. Participants who interacted with design X tend to agree to stay inside more than those who interacted with design Y.
131 131  
132 132  </td>
133 133  </tr>
... ... @@ -143,8 +143,8 @@
143 143  <img src="/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group05/download/Foundation/Operational%20Demands/Personas/WebHome/RQ2.jpg?height=250&rev=1.1" />
144 144  </td>
145 145  <td>
146 -We notice a positive change in valence with the full flow i.e design X (although negligible). This can be because of the music. The valence does not decrease for the baseline which might be due to the novelty effect of seeing Pepper for the first time. The change in arousal in both scenarios is nearly negligible. This might be due to the fact that the interaction with Pepper was very short. 
147 -Additionally, in the case of the full flow i.e design X, these values might have not changed significantly as per the expectation (valence higher, arousal lower) because the music was not personalized for participants.
146 +We notice a positive change in valence with the full flow i.e design X (although negligible). This could be because of the music. The valence does not decrease for the baseline, which might be due to the novelty effect of seeing Pepper for the first time. The change in arousal in both scenarios is nearly negligible. This might be due to the fact that the interaction with Pepper was very short.
147 +Additionally, in the case of the full flow i.e design X, these values might not have changed significantly as per the expectation (valence higher, arousal lower) because the music was not personalized for participants.
148 148  
149 149  </td>
150 150  </tr>