Skip to Content

Changes for page Test

Last modified by Clara Stiller on 2022/04/05 13:44
From version Icon 85.1 Icon
edited by Vishruty Mittal
on 2022/04/02 15:20
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version Icon 81.1 Icon
edited by Vishruty Mittal
on 2022/04/02 15:03
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Icon Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -177,7 +177,7 @@
177 177  <img src="/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group05/download/Foundation/Operational%20Demands/Personas/WebHome/RQ4.jpg?height=250&rev=1.1" />
178 178  </td>
179 179  <td>
180 -We found that participants who knew the songs, enjoyed the music and thought it fit the situation more than the ones who did not know the songs. 
180 +Comment on the graph
181 181  </td>
182 182  </tr>
183 183  </table>
... ... @@ -192,7 +192,7 @@
192 192  <img src="/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group05/download/Foundation/Operational%20Demands/Personas/WebHome/RQ5.jpg?height=250&rev=1.1" />
193 193  </td>
194 194  <td>
195 -As per these results, we can say that if participants have a predilection toward the suggested activity, there is a higher chance of them staying in. Therefore there is a direct correlation between people staying in and their interest in the activity. After personalization, we expect the score to be further increased.
195 +Comment on the graph
196 196  </td>
197 197  </tr>
198 198  </table>
... ... @@ -207,11 +207,7 @@
207 207  <img src="/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group05/download/Foundation/Operational%20Demands/Personas/WebHome/RQ6.jpg?height=250&rev=1.1" />
208 208  </td>
209 209  <td>
210 -We find that the values for co-presence for both conditions are very similar. This may be attributed to the novelty effect and also to the fact that the face recognition module remains unchanged.
211 -The values for attention allocation are similar, but the controlled flow (design Y) has a higher value. We suspect that the potential reason might be, that people start to lose focus with the elongated conversations. 
212 -
213 -Besides the co-presence, all the observations are not statistically significant because of the high variance in the limited responses. 
214 -
210 +Comment on the graph
215 215  </td>
216 216  </tr>
217 217  </table>
... ... @@ -226,7 +226,7 @@
226 226  <img src="/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group05/download/Foundation/Operational%20Demands/Personas/WebHome/RelScores.jpg?height=250&rev=1.1" />
227 227  </td>
228 228  <td>
229 -We achieved a high Cronbatch alpha score (>60%) for almost all the sections of our analysis. Thereby providing reliability to our evaluation.
225 +Comment on the graph
230 230  </td>
231 231  </tr>
232 232  </table>