Skip to Content

Changes for page Test

Last modified by Clara Stiller on 2022/04/05 13:44
From version Icon 83.1 Icon
edited by Vishruty Mittal
on 2022/04/02 15:08
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version Icon 87.1 Icon
edited by Vishruty Mittal
on 2022/04/02 15:58
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Icon Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
1 -Evaluation is an iterative process where the initial iterations focus on examining if the proposed idea is working as intended. Therefore, we want to first understand how realistic and convincing the provided dialogues and suggested activities are, and would they be able to prevent people from wandering. To examine this, we conduct a small pilot study with students, who role-play having dementia. We then observe their interaction with Pepper to examine the effectiveness of our dialog flow in preventing people from wandering.
1 +Evaluation is an iterative process where the initial iterations focus on examining if the proposed idea is working as intended. Therefore, we want to first understand how realistic and convincing the provided dialogues and suggested activities are, and would they be able to prevent people from wandering. To examine this, we conduct a small pilot study with students, who role-play having dementia. We then observe their interaction with Pepper to examine the effectiveness of our dialogue flow in preventing people from wandering.
2 2  
3 3  = Problem statement and research questions =
4 4  
... ... @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
22 22  
23 23  = Method =
24 24  
25 -A between-subject study with students who play the role of having dementia. Data will be collected with a questionnaire that participants fill out before and after interacting with Pepper. The questionnaire captures different aspects of the conversation along with their mood before and after the interaction with Pepper.
25 +We will conduct a between-subject study with students who play the role of having dementia. Data will be collected with a questionnaire that participants fill out before and after interacting with Pepper. The questionnaire captures different aspects of the conversation along with their mood before and after the interaction with Pepper.
26 26  
27 27  For our between-subject study, our independent variable is Pepper trying to distract the users by mentioning different activities along with the corresponding music. Through this, we want to measure the effectiveness of music and activities in preventing people from leaving the care home, which is thereby our dependent variable. So we developed 2 different prototype designs-
28 28  
... ... @@ -207,7 +207,11 @@
207 207  <img src="/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group05/download/Foundation/Operational%20Demands/Personas/WebHome/RQ6.jpg?height=250&rev=1.1" />
208 208  </td>
209 209  <td>
210 -Comment on the graph
210 +We find that the values for co-presence for both conditions are very similar. This may be attributed to the novelty effect and also to the fact that the face recognition module remains unchanged.
211 +The values for attention allocation are similar, but the controlled flow (design Y) has a higher value. We suspect that the potential reason might be, that people start to lose focus with the elongated conversations. 
212 +
213 +Besides the co-presence, all the observations are not statistically significant because of the high variance in the limited responses. 
214 +
211 211  </td>
212 212  </tr>
213 213  </table>
... ... @@ -222,7 +222,7 @@
222 222  <img src="/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group05/download/Foundation/Operational%20Demands/Personas/WebHome/RelScores.jpg?height=250&rev=1.1" />
223 223  </td>
224 224  <td>
225 -Comment on the graph
229 +We achieved a high Cronbatch alpha score (>60%) for almost all the sections of our analysis. Thereby providing reliability to our evaluation.
226 226  </td>
227 227  </tr>
228 228  </table>