Skip to Content

Changes for page Test

Last modified by Clara Stiller on 2022/04/05 13:44
From version Icon 83.1 Icon
edited by Vishruty Mittal
on 2022/04/02 15:08
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version Icon 76.1 Icon
edited by Vishruty Mittal
on 2022/04/02 14:48
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Icon Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -143,7 +143,7 @@
143 143  <img src="/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group05/download/Foundation/Operational%20Demands/Personas/WebHome/RQ2.jpg?height=250&rev=1.1" />
144 144  </td>
145 145  <td>
146 -We notice a positive change in valence with the full flow i.e design X (although negligible). This can be because of the music. The valence does not decrease for the baseline which might be due to the novelty effect of seeing Pepper for the first time. The change in arousal in both scenarios is nearly negligible. This might be due to the fact that the interaction with Pepper was very short. 
146 +There was a positive change in valence with the full flow i.e design X (although negligible). This can be because of the music. The valence does not decrease for the baseline. This might be due to the novelty effect of seeing Pepper for the first time. The change in arousal in both scenarios is nearly negligible. This might be due to the fact that the interaction with Pepper was very short. 
147 147  Additionally, in the case of the full flow i.e design X, these values might have not changed significantly as per the expectation (valence higher, arousal lower) because the music was not personalized for participants.
148 148  
149 149  </td>
... ... @@ -160,9 +160,7 @@
160 160  <img src="/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group05/download/Foundation/Operational%20Demands/Personas/WebHome/RQ3.jpg?height=250&rev=1.1" />
161 161  </td>
162 162  <td>
163 -We notice a very minute difference between the full flow i.e design X, and control condition, design Y. There might be many reasons behind this. The speech recognition module in Pepper was not very efficient to understand different accents and thereby misunderstood words in some cases. <br>
164 -The null hypothesis is perceived message understanding for both the conditions is equal. Given the p value, the null hypothesis can not be rejected. High variance in data and also restrictive sample size could be the reasons behind the insignificant result.
165 -
163 +Comment on the graph
166 166  </td>
167 167  </tr>
168 168  </table>
... ... @@ -177,7 +177,7 @@
177 177  <img src="/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group05/download/Foundation/Operational%20Demands/Personas/WebHome/RQ4.jpg?height=250&rev=1.1" />
178 178  </td>
179 179  <td>
180 -We found that participants who knew the songs, enjoyed the music and thought it fit the situation more than the ones who did not know the songs. 
178 +Comment on the graph
181 181  </td>
182 182  </tr>
183 183  </table>
... ... @@ -192,7 +192,7 @@
192 192  <img src="/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group05/download/Foundation/Operational%20Demands/Personas/WebHome/RQ5.jpg?height=250&rev=1.1" />
193 193  </td>
194 194  <td>
195 -As per these results, we can say that if participants have a predilection toward the suggested activity, there is a higher chance of them staying in. Therefore there is a direct correlation between people staying in and their interest in the activity. After personalization, we expect the score to be further increased.
193 +Comment on the graph
196 196  </td>
197 197  </tr>
198 198  </table>