Skip to Content

Changes for page Test

Last modified by Clara Stiller on 2022/04/05 13:44
From version Icon 82.1 Icon
edited by Vishruty Mittal
on 2022/04/02 15:04
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version Icon 84.1 Icon
edited by Vishruty Mittal
on 2022/04/02 15:16
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Icon Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -192,7 +192,7 @@
192 192  <img src="/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group05/download/Foundation/Operational%20Demands/Personas/WebHome/RQ5.jpg?height=250&rev=1.1" />
193 193  </td>
194 194  <td>
195 -Comment on the graph
195 +As per these results, we can say that if participants have a predilection toward the suggested activity, there is a higher chance of them staying in. Therefore there is a direct correlation between people staying in and their interest in the activity. After personalization, we expect the score to be further increased.
196 196  </td>
197 197  </tr>
198 198  </table>
... ... @@ -207,7 +207,11 @@
207 207  <img src="/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group05/download/Foundation/Operational%20Demands/Personas/WebHome/RQ6.jpg?height=250&rev=1.1" />
208 208  </td>
209 209  <td>
210 -Comment on the graph
210 +We find that the values for co-presence for both conditions are very similar. This may be attributed to the novelty effect and also to the fact that the face recognition module remains unchanged.
211 +The values for attention allocation are similar, but the controlled flow (design Y) has a higher value. We suspect that the potential reason might be, that people start to lose focus with the elongated conversations. 
212 +
213 +Besides the co-presence, all the observations are not statistically significant because of the high variance in the limited responses. 
214 +
211 211  </td>
212 212  </tr>
213 213  </table>