Changes for page Test

Summary

• Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Content

...	...	@@ -177,7 +177,7 @@
177	177	<img src="/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group05/download/Foundation/Operational%20Demands/Personas/WebHome/RQ4.jpg?height=250&rev=1.1" />
178	178	</td>
179	179	<td>
180		-Comment on the graph
	180	+We found that participants who knew the songs, enjoyed the music and thought it fit the situation more than the ones who did not know the songs.
181	181	</td>
182	182	</tr>
183	183	</table>
...	...	@@ -192,7 +192,7 @@
192	192	<img src="/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group05/download/Foundation/Operational%20Demands/Personas/WebHome/RQ5.jpg?height=250&rev=1.1" />
193	193	</td>
194	194	<td>
195		-Comment on the graph
	195	+As per these results, we can say that if participants have a predilection toward the suggested activity, there is a higher chance of them staying in. Therefore there is a direct correlation between people staying in and their interest in the activity. After personalization, we expect the score to be further increased.
196	196	</td>
197	197	</tr>
198	198	</table>
...	...	@@ -207,7 +207,11 @@
207	207	<img src="/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group05/download/Foundation/Operational%20Demands/Personas/WebHome/RQ6.jpg?height=250&rev=1.1" />
208	208	</td>
209	209	<td>
210		-Comment on the graph
	210	+We find that the values for co-presence for both conditions are very similar. This may be attributed to the novelty effect and also to the fact that the face recognition module remains unchanged.
	211	+The values for attention allocation are similar, but the controlled flow (design Y) has a higher value. We suspect that the potential reason might be, that people start to lose focus with the elongated conversations.
	212	+
	213	+Besides the co-presence, all the observations are not statistically significant because of the high variance in the limited responses.
	214	+
211	211	</td>
212	212	</tr>
213	213	</table>