Skip to Content

Changes for page Test

Last modified by Clara Stiller on 2022/04/05 13:44
From version Icon 80.1 Icon
edited by Vishruty Mittal
on 2022/04/02 15:02
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version Icon 82.1 Icon
edited by Vishruty Mittal
on 2022/04/02 15:04
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Icon Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -161,7 +161,7 @@
161 161  </td>
162 162  <td>
163 163  We notice a very minute difference between the full flow i.e design X, and control condition, design Y. There might be many reasons behind this. The speech recognition module in Pepper was not very efficient to understand different accents and thereby misunderstood words in some cases. <br>
164 -The null hypothesis is perceived message understanding for both the conditions is equal. Given the p value, the null hypothesis can not be rejected. We see a high variance in data and also the sample size is very restrictive which could be the reason behind the insignificant result.
164 +The null hypothesis is perceived message understanding for both the conditions is equal. Given the p value, the null hypothesis can not be rejected. High variance in data and also restrictive sample size could be the reasons behind the insignificant result.
165 165  
166 166  </td>
167 167  </tr>
... ... @@ -177,7 +177,7 @@
177 177  <img src="/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group05/download/Foundation/Operational%20Demands/Personas/WebHome/RQ4.jpg?height=250&rev=1.1" />
178 178  </td>
179 179  <td>
180 -Comment on the graph
180 +We found that participants who knew the songs, enjoyed the music and thought it fit the situation more than the ones who did not know the songs. 
181 181  </td>
182 182  </tr>
183 183  </table>