Skip to Content

Changes for page Test

Last modified by Clara Stiller on 2022/04/05 13:44
From version Icon 77.1 Icon
edited by Vishruty Mittal
on 2022/04/02 14:49
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version Icon 86.1 Icon
edited by Vishruty Mittal
on 2022/04/02 15:57
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Icon Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
1 -Evaluation is an iterative process where the initial iterations focus on examining if the proposed idea is working as intended. Therefore, we want to first understand how realistic and convincing the provided dialogues and suggested activities are, and would they be able to prevent people from wandering. To examine this, we conduct a small pilot study with students, who role-play having dementia. We then observe their interaction with Pepper to examine the effectiveness of our dialog flow in preventing people from wandering.
1 +Evaluation is an iterative process where the initial iterations focus on examining if the proposed idea is working as intended. Therefore, we want to first understand how realistic and convincing the provided dialogues and suggested activities are, and would they be able to prevent people from wandering. To examine this, we conduct a small pilot study with students, who role-play having dementia. We then observe their interaction with Pepper to examine the effectiveness of our dialogue flow in preventing people from wandering.
2 2  
3 3  = Problem statement and research questions =
4 4  
... ... @@ -160,7 +160,9 @@
160 160  <img src="/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group05/download/Foundation/Operational%20Demands/Personas/WebHome/RQ3.jpg?height=250&rev=1.1" />
161 161  </td>
162 162  <td>
163 -Comment on the graph
163 +We notice a very minute difference between the full flow i.e design X, and control condition, design Y. There might be many reasons behind this. The speech recognition module in Pepper was not very efficient to understand different accents and thereby misunderstood words in some cases. <br>
164 +The null hypothesis is perceived message understanding for both the conditions is equal. Given the p value, the null hypothesis can not be rejected. High variance in data and also restrictive sample size could be the reasons behind the insignificant result.
165 +
164 164  </td>
165 165  </tr>
166 166  </table>
... ... @@ -175,7 +175,7 @@
175 175  <img src="/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group05/download/Foundation/Operational%20Demands/Personas/WebHome/RQ4.jpg?height=250&rev=1.1" />
176 176  </td>
177 177  <td>
178 -Comment on the graph
180 +We found that participants who knew the songs, enjoyed the music and thought it fit the situation more than the ones who did not know the songs. 
179 179  </td>
180 180  </tr>
181 181  </table>
... ... @@ -190,7 +190,7 @@
190 190  <img src="/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group05/download/Foundation/Operational%20Demands/Personas/WebHome/RQ5.jpg?height=250&rev=1.1" />
191 191  </td>
192 192  <td>
193 -Comment on the graph
195 +As per these results, we can say that if participants have a predilection toward the suggested activity, there is a higher chance of them staying in. Therefore there is a direct correlation between people staying in and their interest in the activity. After personalization, we expect the score to be further increased.
194 194  </td>
195 195  </tr>
196 196  </table>
... ... @@ -205,7 +205,11 @@
205 205  <img src="/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group05/download/Foundation/Operational%20Demands/Personas/WebHome/RQ6.jpg?height=250&rev=1.1" />
206 206  </td>
207 207  <td>
208 -Comment on the graph
210 +We find that the values for co-presence for both conditions are very similar. This may be attributed to the novelty effect and also to the fact that the face recognition module remains unchanged.
211 +The values for attention allocation are similar, but the controlled flow (design Y) has a higher value. We suspect that the potential reason might be, that people start to lose focus with the elongated conversations. 
212 +
213 +Besides the co-presence, all the observations are not statistically significant because of the high variance in the limited responses. 
214 +
209 209  </td>
210 210  </tr>
211 211  </table>
... ... @@ -220,7 +220,7 @@
220 220  <img src="/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group05/download/Foundation/Operational%20Demands/Personas/WebHome/RelScores.jpg?height=250&rev=1.1" />
221 221  </td>
222 222  <td>
223 -Comment on the graph
229 +We achieved a high Cronbatch alpha score (>60%) for almost all the sections of our analysis. Thereby providing reliability to our evaluation.
224 224  </td>
225 225  </tr>
226 226  </table>