Skip to Content

Changes for page Test

Last modified by Clara Stiller on 2022/04/05 13:44
From version Icon 76.1 Icon
edited by Vishruty Mittal
on 2022/04/02 14:48
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version Icon 79.1 Icon
edited by Vishruty Mittal
on 2022/04/02 15:00
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Icon Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -143,7 +143,7 @@
143 143  <img src="/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group05/download/Foundation/Operational%20Demands/Personas/WebHome/RQ2.jpg?height=250&rev=1.1" />
144 144  </td>
145 145  <td>
146 -There was a positive change in valence with the full flow i.e design X (although negligible). This can be because of the music. The valence does not decrease for the baseline. This might be due to the novelty effect of seeing Pepper for the first time. The change in arousal in both scenarios is nearly negligible. This might be due to the fact that the interaction with Pepper was very short. 
146 +We notice a positive change in valence with the full flow i.e design X (although negligible). This can be because of the music. The valence does not decrease for the baseline which might be due to the novelty effect of seeing Pepper for the first time. The change in arousal in both scenarios is nearly negligible. This might be due to the fact that the interaction with Pepper was very short. 
147 147  Additionally, in the case of the full flow i.e design X, these values might have not changed significantly as per the expectation (valence higher, arousal lower) because the music was not personalized for participants.
148 148  
149 149  </td>
... ... @@ -160,7 +160,9 @@
160 160  <img src="/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group05/download/Foundation/Operational%20Demands/Personas/WebHome/RQ3.jpg?height=250&rev=1.1" />
161 161  </td>
162 162  <td>
163 -Comment on the graph
163 +We notice a very minute difference between the full flow i.e design X, and control condition, design Y. There might be many reasons behind this. The speech recognition module in Pepper was not very efficient to understand different accents and thereby misunderstood words in some cases.
164 +The null hypothesis is perceived message understanding for both the conditions is equal. Given the p value, the null hypothesis can not be rejected. We see a high variance in data and also the sample size is very restrictive which could be the reason behind the insignificant result.
165 +
164 164  </td>
165 165  </tr>
166 166  </table>