Changes for page Test

Summary

• Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Content

...	...	@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
6	6
7	7	**Research Questions (RQ):**
8	8
	9	+
9	9	1. What percentage of people are prevented from going out unsupervised? (Quantitative) (CL01, CL05)
10	10	1. How does the interaction change the participant's mood? (CL02)
11	11	1. Can the robot respond appropriately to the participant's intention? (CL03)
...	...	@@ -30,8 +30,8 @@
30	30
31	31	== Participants ==
32	32
33		-17 students who play the role of having dementia. They will be divided into two groups. One group (11 participants) will be interacting with design X (group 1) robot while the other group (6 students) will interact with the design Y (group 2).
34		-It is assumed that all participants are living at the same care center.
	34	+The ideal participants for our user study would have been people suffering from dementia. As the people in this section fall under vulnerable groups, testing with them would have been very difficult due to the current pandemic situation. Therefore we planned to conduct our experiments with students instead.
	35	+Our experiment involves 17 students who play the role of having dementia. They will be divided into two groups. One group (11 participants) will be interacting with design X while the other group (6 students) will interact with design Y.
35	35
36	36	== Experimental design ==
37	37
...	...	@@ -53,8 +53,12 @@
53	53
54	54	== Material ==
55	55
56		-Pepper, laptop, door, and music.
	57	+The items required for this evaluation are the following:
57	57
	59	+* Pepper
	60	+* Door
	61	+* Caretaker in a nearby room in case of emergency
	62	+
58	58	= Results =
59	59
60	60	{{html}}
...	...	@@ -122,7 +122,8 @@
122	122	<img src="/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group05/download/Foundation/Operational%20Demands/Personas/WebHome/RQ1.jpg?height=250&rev=1.1" />
123	123	</td>
124	124	<td>
125		-Comment on the graph
	130	+We used a Likert scale for this question, 1 being the lowest and 5 being the highest. Participants who interacted with design Y tend to agree less to stay inside compared to the people who interacted with design X.
	131	+
126	126	</td>
127	127	</tr>
128	128	</table>
...	...	@@ -137,7 +137,9 @@
137	137	<img src="/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group05/download/Foundation/Operational%20Demands/Personas/WebHome/RQ2.jpg?height=250&rev=1.1" />
138	138	</td>
139	139	<td>
140		-Comment on the graph
	146	+We notice a positive change in valence with the full flow i.e design X (although negligible). This can be because of the music. The valence does not decrease for the baseline which might be due to the novelty effect of seeing Pepper for the first time. The change in arousal in both scenarios is nearly negligible. This might be due to the fact that the interaction with Pepper was very short.
	147	+Additionally, in the case of the full flow i.e design X, these values might have not changed significantly as per the expectation (valence higher, arousal lower) because the music was not personalized for participants.
	148	+
141	141	</td>
142	142	</tr>
143	143	</table>