Changes for page Test
Last modified by Clara Stiller on 2022/04/05 13:44
From version
6.2


edited by Clara Stiller
on 2022/03/25 11:33
on 2022/03/25 11:33
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
To version
7.2


edited by Clara Stiller
on 2022/03/25 14:27
on 2022/03/25 14:27
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
Details
- Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -96,6 +96,14 @@ 96 96 97 97 **Results from Questionnaire:** 98 98 99 +1. Condition 1 - intelligent Prototype: 100 +8 out of 11 Participants answered, that they don't know the music that has been played. If we told them afterward the title of the song, most participants do know the song. Why didn't they recognize it during the interaction? 101 +This can have two reasons: The part of the song we pick was too short to be recognized or not the most significant part of the song. For example, the beginning of "escape - the pina colada song" is not as well known as its chorus. Another reason could be, that the participant was distracted or confused by the robot and therefore couldn't carefully listen to the music. 102 +Nonetheless, 8 out of 11 people agreed, that the music fits to the situation 103 + 104 +One of our claims, to use music that fits to the situation or place, 105 + 106 + 99 99 **Feedback from Participants:** 100 100 101 101 **Observations:** ... ... @@ -109,9 +109,10 @@ 109 109 2.2. if the participant passes pepper from the side, the face was not recognized. Therefore, we told people to walk from the front towards pepper. In most cases that helped detect the face. 110 110 2.3. face detection doesn't work with face masks. This could lead to huge problems in the usage of pepper in care homes. 111 111 112 -One of the most frequent and noticeable reactions from participants was **confusion**. This feeling was caused by two main factors: misunderstandings from speech recognition which leads to unsuitable answers from pepper, as well as the unsuitable environment and setting of our evaluation. 120 +One of the most frequent and noticeable reactions from participants was **confusion**. This feeling was caused by two main factors: 121 +misunderstandings from speech recognition which leads to unsuitable answers from pepper, as well as the unsuitable environment and setting of our evaluation. 113 113 The reasons for failure in speech recognition are listed above. An unsuitable answer can e.g. be an argument to stay inside, that doesn't fit the participant's reason to leave. Also, some people told in a long sentence that they don't like the provided activity and still want to leave. If the speech recognition fails in this case and pepper understood you would like to do the activity, it seems like it encourages you to leave, instead of doing the activity. This leads to the total opposite of our intention. 114 -Furthermore, we found out, that our prototype doesn't fit in the environment of the lab. We encourage the participant to do some activities, that they can't do in the lab environment (go to the living room, have a coffee or do a puzzle). If the robot tells asks you if you want to do thi s, most people didn't know how to react andwere insecure about how to answer. Participants "freeze" in front of the robot or just left the room.123 +Furthermore, we found out, that our prototype doesn't fit in the environment of the lab. We encourage the participant to do some activities, that they can't do in the lab environment (go to the living room, have a coffee or do a puzzle). If the robot tells asks you if you want to do the activity, most people don't know how to react and are insecure about how to answer. Participants "freeze" in front of the robot or just left the room. 115 115 116 116 117 117