Changes for page Test

Summary

• Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Content

...	...	@@ -93,13 +93,27 @@
93	93
94	94
95	95	= Results =
	96	+
96	96	**Results from Questionnaire:**
97	97
98		-Feedback from Participants:
	99	+**Feedback from Participants:**
99	99
100		-Observations:
	101	+**Observations:**
	102	+Problems that occurred during the evaluation
101	101
	104	+1. lots of difficulties with speech recognition:
	105	+1.1. even though the participant said one of the expected words, pepper understood it wrong and continued with a wrong path
	106	+1.2. If the participant started to talk before pepper was listening (eyes turning blue), it misses a "yes" or "no" at the beginning of the sentence, which causes misunderstandings.
	107	+1. problems with face detection
	108	+2.1. due to bad light face was not recognized
	109	+2.2. if the participant passes pepper from the side, the face was not recognized. Therefore, we told people to walk from the front towards pepper. In most cases that helped detect the face.
	110	+2.3. face detection doesn't work with face masks. This could lead to huge problems in the usage of pepper in care homes.
102	102
	112	+One of the most frequent and noticeable reactions from participants was **confusion**. This feeling was caused by two main factors:
	113	+misunderstandings from speech recognition which leads to unsuitable answers from pepper, as well as the unsuitable environment and setting of our evaluation.
	114	+The reasons for failure in speech recognition are listed above. An unsuitable answer can e.g. be an argument to stay inside, that doesn't fit the participant's reason to leave. Also, some people told in a long sentence that they don't like the provided activity and still want to leave. If the speech recognition fails in this case and pepper understood you would like to do the activity, it seems like it encourages you to leave, instead of doing the activity. This leads to the total opposite of our intention.
	115	+Furthermore, we found out, that our prototype doesn't fit in the environment of the lab. We encourage the participant to do some activities, that they can't do in the lab environment (go to the living room, have a coffee or do a puzzle). If the robot tells asks you if you want to do the activity, most people don't know how to react and are insecure about how to answer. Participants "freeze" in front of the robot or just left the room.
	116	+
103	103	= Discussion =
104	104
105	105