Changes for page Test

Last modified by Clara Stiller on 2022/04/05 13:44

From 53.1 to 52.3 From 60.1 to 59.1

From version

59.1

edited by Vishruty Mittal
on 2022/04/02 11:51

Change comment: There is no comment for this version

To version

53.1

edited by Sayak Mukherjee
on 2022/04/02 02:40

Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Raw
Rendered

Summary

Page properties (2 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
Objects (1 modified, 0 added, 1 removed)
- XWiki.XWikiComments[1]
- XWiki.XWikiComments[2]

Details

Page properties

Author

@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
--XWiki.Vishruty
++XWiki.SayakMukherjee

Content

@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
--Evaluation is an iterative process where the initial iterations focus on examining if the proposed idea is working as intended. Therefore, we want to first understand how realistic and convincing the provided dialogues and suggested activities are, and would they be able to prevent people from wandering. To examine this, we conduct a small pilot study with students, who role-play having dementia. We then observe their interaction with Pepper to examine the effectiveness of our dialog flow in preventing people from wandering.
++The best way to test our prototype would be a study with persons with dementia. However, testing the robot in a real environment would be very time-consuming, because it is not predictable if and when people with dementia start wandering. Hence it is out of the scope of this project.
++Nevertheless, we wanted to get a first impression of how realistic and convincing the provided dialogues and suggested activities are. In a small study with students, who play the role of having dementia, we are observing the interaction with the robot with an aim to find out how effective it is in preventing people from wandering.
  = Problem statement and research questions =
@@ -23,11 +23,11 @@
  = Method =
--A between-subject study with students who play the role of having dementia. Data will be collected with a questionnaire that participants fill out before and after interacting with Pepper. The questionnaire captured different aspects of their conversation.
++A between-subject study with students who play the role of having dementia. Data will be collected with a questionnaire (before and after participation), observing the participant's body language and the way that they're responding to Pepper.
  == Participants ==
--17 students who play the role of having dementia. They will be divided into two groups. One group (11 participants) will be interacting with the intelligent (group 1) robot while the other group (6 students) will interact with the unintelligent robot (group 2).
++18 students who play the role of having dementia. They will be divided into two groups. One group (11 participants) will be interacting with the intelligent (group 1) robot while the other group (7 students) will interact with the unintelligent robot (group 2).
  It is assumed that all participants are living at the same care center.
  Before they start, they can choose how stubborn they want to be and where they want to go.
@@ -98,8 +98,8 @@
  Pepper, laptop, door, and music.
--= Results =
++= Results =
  {{html}}
  <!--=== Comparison between intelligent (cond. 1) and less intelligent (cond. 2) prototype ===
@@ -156,13 +156,19 @@
  Furthermore, we found out, that our prototype doesn't fit in the environment of the lab. We encourage the participant to do some activities, that they can't do in the lab environment (go to the living room, have a coffee or do a puzzle). If the robot tells asks you if you want to do the activity, most people don't know how to react and are insecure about how to answer. Participants "freeze" in front of the robot or just left the room. -->
  {{/html}}
--=== RQ1: Are people convinced not to go out unsupervised? ===
++1. What percentage of people are prevented from going out unsupervised? (Quantitative) (CL01, CL05)
++1. How does the interaction change the participant's mood? (CL02)
++1. Can the robot respond appropriately to the participant's intention? (CL03)
++1. How do the participants react to the music? (CL04)
++1. Does the activity that the robot suggests prevent people from wandering/ leaving? (CL06)
++1. Can pepper identify and catch the attention of the PwD?
++=== RQ1: Are people convinced not to go out unsupervised? ===
  {{html}}
  <table style="width: 100%">
  <tr>
  <td style="width: 50%">
--<img src="/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group05/download/Foundation/Operational%20Demands/Personas/WebHome/RQ1.jpg?height=250&rev=1.1" />
++<img src="/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group05/download/Foundation/Operational%20Demands/Personas/WebHome/Storyboard_1.png?height=750&rev=1.1" />
  </td>
  <td>
  Comment on the graph
@@ -172,12 +172,11 @@
  {{/html}}
  === RQ2: How does the interaction change the participant's mood? ===
--
  {{html}}
  <table style="width: 100%">
  <tr>
  <td style="width: 50%">
--<img src="/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group05/download/Foundation/Operational%20Demands/Personas/WebHome/RQ2.jpg?height=250&rev=1.1" />
++<img src="/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group05/download/Foundation/Operational%20Demands/Personas/WebHome/Storyboard_1.png?height=750&rev=1.1" />
  </td>
  <td>
  Comment on the graph
@@ -187,12 +187,11 @@
  {{/html}}
  === RQ3: Can the robot respond appropriately to the participant's intention? ===
--
  {{html}}
  <table style="width: 100%">
  <tr>
  <td style="width: 50%">
--<img src="/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group05/download/Foundation/Operational%20Demands/Personas/WebHome/RQ3.jpg?height=250&rev=1.1" />
++<img src="/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group05/download/Foundation/Operational%20Demands/Personas/WebHome/Storyboard_1.png?height=750&rev=1.1" />
  </td>
  <td>
  Comment on the graph
@@ -202,12 +202,11 @@
  {{/html}}
  === RQ4: How do the participants react to the music? ===
--
  {{html}}
  <table style="width: 100%">
  <tr>
  <td style="width: 50%">
--<img src="/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group05/download/Foundation/Operational%20Demands/Personas/WebHome/RQ4.jpg?height=250&rev=1.1" />
++<img src="/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group05/download/Foundation/Operational%20Demands/Personas/WebHome/Storyboard_1.png?height=750&rev=1.1" />
  </td>
  <td>
  Comment on the graph
@@ -217,12 +217,11 @@
  {{/html}}
  === RQ5: Does the activity that the robot suggests prevent people from wandering/ leaving? ===
--
  {{html}}
  <table style="width: 100%">
  <tr>
  <td style="width: 50%">
--<img src="/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group05/download/Foundation/Operational%20Demands/Personas/WebHome/RQ5.jpg?height=250&rev=1.1" />
++<img src="/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group05/download/Foundation/Operational%20Demands/Personas/WebHome/Storyboard_1.png?height=750&rev=1.1" />
  </td>
  <td>
  Comment on the graph
@@ -232,12 +232,11 @@
  {{/html}}
  === RQ6: Can pepper identify and catch the attention of the PwD? ===
--
  {{html}}
  <table style="width: 100%">
  <tr>
  <td style="width: 50%">
--<img src="/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group05/download/Foundation/Operational%20Demands/Personas/WebHome/RQ6.jpg?height=250&rev=1.1" />
++<img src="/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group05/download/Foundation/Operational%20Demands/Personas/WebHome/Storyboard_1.png?height=750&rev=1.1" />
  </td>
  <td>
  Comment on the graph
@@ -247,12 +247,11 @@
  {{/html}}
  === Reliabity Scores ===
--
  {{html}}
  <table style="width: 100%">
  <tr>
  <td style="width: 50%">
--<img src="/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group05/download/Foundation/Operational%20Demands/Personas/WebHome/RelScores.jpg?height=250&rev=1.1" />
++<img src="/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group05/download/Foundation/Operational%20Demands/Personas/WebHome/Storyboard_1.png?height=750&rev=1.1" />
  </td>
  <td>
  Comment on the graph
@@ -261,7 +261,7 @@
  </table>
  {{/html}}
--= Limitation =
++= Limitation=
  * **Lab Environment**: The lab environment is different from a care home, the participants found it difficult to process the suggestions made by Pepper. For example, if Pepper asked someone to visit the living room, it created confusion among the participants regarding their next action.
@@ -272,7 +272,6 @@
  * **Face Detection**: The face recognition module within Pepper is also rudimentary in nature. It can not detect half faces are when participants approach from the side. Adding to the problem, the lighting condition in the lab was not sufficient for the reliable functioning of the face recognition module. Hence Pepper failed to notice the participant in some cases and did not start the dialogue flow.
  = Conclusions =
--
  * People who liked the activity tend to stay in
  * People who knew the music found it more fitting
  * People are more convinced to stay in with the intelligent prototype
@@ -281,8 +281,8 @@
  * Experiment with personalization
  = Future Work =
--
  * **Personalisation**: Personalize music, and activity preferences according to the person interacting with Pepper.
  * **Robot Collaboration**: Collaborate with other robots such as Miro to assist a person with dementia while going for a walk instead of the caretaker.
  * **Recognise Person**: For a personalised experience, it is essential that Pepper is able to identify each person based on an internal database.
  * **Fine Tune Speech Recognition**: Improvements are necessary for the speech recognition module before the actual deployment of the project in a care home. Additionally, support for multiple languages can be considered to engage with non-English speaking people.
++

XWiki.XWikiComments[1]

Comment

@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
--Add claim number with RQ6 once claims are fixed back
++Modified Research Questions so that they align with claims

Date

@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
--2022-04-02 11:44:44.339
++2022-03-26 13:50:45.49

XWiki.XWikiComments[2]

Author

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-XWiki.Vishruty

Comment

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Check if RQ and claims align with each other(CL numbers) once claims are reverted.

Date

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-2022-04-02 11:45:38.960