Skip to Content

Changes for page Test

Last modified by Clara Stiller on 2022/04/05 13:44
From version Icon 56.3 Icon
edited by Vishruty Mittal
on 2022/04/02 11:44
Change comment: Added comment
To version Icon 59.1 Icon
edited by Vishruty Mittal
on 2022/04/02 11:51
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Icon Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
1 -Evaluation is an iterative process where the initial iterations focus on examining if the proposed idea is working as intended. Therefore, we wanted to first understand how realistic and convincing the provided dialogues and suggested activities are, and would they be able to prevent people from wandering. To examine this, we conducted a small pilot study with students, who role-played having dementia. We then observed their interaction with Pepper to examine the effectiveness of our dialog flow in preventing people from wandering.
1 +Evaluation is an iterative process where the initial iterations focus on examining if the proposed idea is working as intended. Therefore, we want to first understand how realistic and convincing the provided dialogues and suggested activities are, and would they be able to prevent people from wandering. To examine this, we conduct a small pilot study with students, who role-play having dementia. We then observe their interaction with Pepper to examine the effectiveness of our dialog flow in preventing people from wandering.
2 2  
3 3  
4 4  = Problem statement and research questions =
... ... @@ -23,11 +23,11 @@
23 23  
24 24  = Method =
25 25  
26 -A between-subject study with students who play the role of having dementia. Data will be collected with a questionnaire (before and after participation), observing the participant's body language and the way that they're responding to Pepper.
26 +A between-subject study with students who play the role of having dementia. Data will be collected with a questionnaire that participants fill out before and after interacting with Pepper. The questionnaire captured different aspects of their conversation.
27 27  
28 28  == Participants ==
29 29  
30 -18 students who play the role of having dementia. They will be divided into two groups. One group (11 participants) will be interacting with the intelligent (group 1) robot while the other group (7 students) will interact with the unintelligent robot (group 2).
30 +17 students who play the role of having dementia. They will be divided into two groups. One group (11 participants) will be interacting with the intelligent (group 1) robot while the other group (6 students) will interact with the unintelligent robot (group 2).
31 31  It is assumed that all participants are living at the same care center.
32 32  Before they start, they can choose how stubborn they want to be and where they want to go.
33 33  
... ... @@ -98,8 +98,8 @@
98 98  
99 99  Pepper, laptop, door, and music.
100 100  
101 -
102 102  = Results =
102 +
103 103  {{html}}
104 104  <!--=== Comparison between intelligent (cond. 1) and less intelligent (cond. 2) prototype ===
105 105  
... ... @@ -157,6 +157,7 @@
157 157  {{/html}}
158 158  
159 159  === RQ1: Are people convinced not to go out unsupervised? ===
160 +
160 160  {{html}}
161 161  <table style="width: 100%">
162 162  <tr>
... ... @@ -171,6 +171,7 @@
171 171  {{/html}}
172 172  
173 173  === RQ2: How does the interaction change the participant's mood? ===
175 +
174 174  {{html}}
175 175  <table style="width: 100%">
176 176  <tr>
... ... @@ -185,6 +185,7 @@
185 185  {{/html}}
186 186  
187 187  === RQ3: Can the robot respond appropriately to the participant's intention? ===
190 +
188 188  {{html}}
189 189  <table style="width: 100%">
190 190  <tr>
... ... @@ -199,6 +199,7 @@
199 199  {{/html}}
200 200  
201 201  === RQ4: How do the participants react to the music? ===
205 +
202 202  {{html}}
203 203  <table style="width: 100%">
204 204  <tr>
... ... @@ -213,6 +213,7 @@
213 213  {{/html}}
214 214  
215 215  === RQ5: Does the activity that the robot suggests prevent people from wandering/ leaving? ===
220 +
216 216  {{html}}
217 217  <table style="width: 100%">
218 218  <tr>
... ... @@ -227,6 +227,7 @@
227 227  {{/html}}
228 228  
229 229  === RQ6: Can pepper identify and catch the attention of the PwD? ===
235 +
230 230  {{html}}
231 231  <table style="width: 100%">
232 232  <tr>
... ... @@ -241,6 +241,7 @@
241 241  {{/html}}
242 242  
243 243  === Reliabity Scores ===
250 +
244 244  {{html}}
245 245  <table style="width: 100%">
246 246  <tr>
... ... @@ -254,7 +254,7 @@
254 254  </table>
255 255  {{/html}}
256 256  
257 -= Limitation=
264 += Limitation =
258 258  
259 259  * **Lab Environment**: The lab environment is different from a care home, the participants found it difficult to process the suggestions made by Pepper. For example, if Pepper asked someone to visit the living room, it created confusion among the participants regarding their next action.
260 260  
... ... @@ -265,6 +265,7 @@
265 265  * **Face Detection**: The face recognition module within Pepper is also rudimentary in nature. It can not detect half faces are when participants approach from the side. Adding to the problem, the lighting condition in the lab was not sufficient for the reliable functioning of the face recognition module. Hence Pepper failed to notice the participant in some cases and did not start the dialogue flow.
266 266  
267 267  = Conclusions =
275 +
268 268  * People who liked the activity tend to stay in
269 269  * People who knew the music found it more fitting
270 270  * People are more convinced to stay in with the intelligent prototype
... ... @@ -273,8 +273,8 @@
273 273  * Experiment with personalization
274 274  
275 275  = Future Work =
284 +
276 276  * **Personalisation**: Personalize music, and activity preferences according to the person interacting with Pepper.
277 277  * **Robot Collaboration**: Collaborate with other robots such as Miro to assist a person with dementia while going for a walk instead of the caretaker.
278 278  * **Recognise Person**: For a personalised experience, it is essential that Pepper is able to identify each person based on an internal database.
279 279  * **Fine Tune Speech Recognition**: Improvements are necessary for the speech recognition module before the actual deployment of the project in a care home. Additionally, support for multiple languages can be considered to engage with non-English speaking people.
280 -
Icon XWiki.XWikiComments[2]
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.Vishruty
Comment
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Check if RQ and claims align with each other(CL numbers) once claims are reverted.
Date
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +2022-04-02 11:45:38.960