Skip to Content

Changes for page Test

Last modified by Clara Stiller on 2022/04/05 13:44
From version Icon 55.1 Icon
edited by Sayak Mukherjee
on 2022/04/02 02:46
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version Icon 56.1 Icon
edited by Vishruty Mittal
on 2022/04/02 11:38
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Icon Page properties
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -XWiki.SayakMukherjee
1 +XWiki.Vishruty
Content
... ... @@ -1,5 +1,4 @@
1 -The best way to test our prototype would be a study with persons with dementia. However, testing the robot in a real environment would be very time-consuming, because it is not predictable if and when people with dementia start wandering. Hence it is out of the scope of this project.
2 -Nevertheless, we wanted to get a first impression of how realistic and convincing the provided dialogues and suggested activities are. In a small study with students, who play the role of having dementia, we are observing the interaction with the robot with an aim to find out how effective it is in preventing people from wandering.
1 +Evaluation is an iterative process where the initial iterations focus on examining if the proposed idea is working as intended. Therefore, we wanted to first understand how realistic and convincing the provided dialogues and suggested activities are, and would they be able to prevent people from wandering. To examine this, we conducted a small pilot study with students, who role-played having dementia. We then observed their interaction with Pepper to examine the effectiveness of our dialog flow in preventing people from wandering.
3 3  
4 4  
5 5  = Problem statement and research questions =