Changes for page Design Patterns

Summary

• Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Content

...	...	@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
34	34	|**Solution structure**|[[image:TDP1-improved.png||height="400"]]
35	35	|**Solution description**|In the event that a PwD wants to leave the building, the robot will interact with them. The goal of this interaction is to convince the PwD to stay inside. This can be done by asking certain questions to identify the intentions and mental state of the PwD, and responding with certain arguments or alternatives. If this is unsuccessful and the PwD goes out nonetheless, the robot will alert a caretaker of this event, transitioning from Scene A to Scene B. The caretaker will respond to this as soon as possible to prevent the PwD from going too far or getting into too many dangerous situations. The caretaker will go after the PwD, track them down and bring them back inside safely, after which the setting returns to Scene A.
36	36	|**Human RQ**|The caretaker needs to be available to respond in a relatively small amount of time and needs to be able to track down the PwD faster than they can wander.
37		-|**Robot RQ**|TODO create RQ
	37	+|**Robot RQ**|The robot needs to be able to signal the caretaker to take over at the right time (RQ007), and initiate the design pattern once the PwD nears the door (RQ001/RQ002). Other aspects are covered by the other design patterns which can be seen as concrete examples of Scene A.
38	38
39	39	== IDP1
40	40	|**Problem**|Sometimes, a person with dementia (PwD) might want to go out for a very trivial reason - for example, they might want to go to a doctor's appointment, do groceries or have coffee with the neighbours. In such cases, a rather simple counterargument might be more than enough to have these people stay inside. Alternatively, a different activity might be a reason for them to stay in as well. In such situations, the robot should be able to provide these counterarguments or activities.