Wiki source code of Measuring Instruments
Show last authors
author | version | line-number | content |
---|---|---|---|
1 | |||
2 | |||
3 | |||
4 | == Basics== | ||
5 | |||
6 | === Decide framework=== | ||
7 | |||
8 | ==== DETERMINE THE GOALS==== | ||
9 | |||
10 | * What are the high-level goals of the evaluation? | ||
11 | * Who wants it and why? | ||
12 | * The goals influence the approach used for the study. | ||
13 | |||
14 | EXPLORE THE QUESTIONS | ||
15 | Define (sub)goals & (sub)research questions. | ||
16 | |||
17 | CHOOSE EVALUATION APPROACH & | ||
18 | METHODS | ||
19 | The evaluation approach influences the methods used, and in turn, | ||
20 | how data is collected, analyzed and presented | ||
21 | |||
22 | IDENTIFY PRACTICAL ISSUES | ||
23 | For example: | ||
24 | * Select users. | ||
25 | * Stay on budget. | ||
26 | * Stay on schedule. | ||
27 | * Find participants. | ||
28 | * Select equipment. | ||
29 | Perform a pilot (trial) study! | ||
30 | |||
31 | DECIDE ABOUT ETHICAL ISSUES | ||
32 | |||
33 | EVALUATE, ANALYZE, INTERPRET AND PRESENT THE DATA | ||
34 | |||
35 | The approach and methods used influence how data | ||
36 | is evaluated, analyzed, interpreted and presented. | ||
37 | |||
38 | |||
39 | |||
40 | ==== GOOD EVALUATION ==== | ||
41 | |||
42 | * Establishing convincing arguments for your design solution | ||
43 | |||
44 | * By conducting complementary and regular evaluations at different stages | ||
45 | of your design process using the appropriate evaluation methods | ||
46 | (e.g. summative, formative, expert-based, observational, ...) | ||
47 | |||
48 | * Evaluations should result in insights regarding possible problems and | ||
49 | their causes in order to support refinement of your design specification | ||
50 | |||
51 | * Look at user experience in its full breadth: Effectiveness, efficiency, | ||
52 | satisfaction, learnability, mood, connectedness, ... | ||
53 | |||
54 | |||
55 | |||
56 | |||
57 |