Show last authors
| author | version | line-number | content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | **Positive and Negative effects for each stakeholder:** | ||
| 2 | |||
| 3 | **PwD:** | ||
| 4 | |||
| 5 | + The user is prevented from getting lost. He/ She won't get in a dangerous situation outdoor. | ||
| 6 | + Brings PwD back to reality | ||
| 7 | + Better mood after talking to robot | ||
| 8 | |||
| 9 | - getting angry when robot not letting him/ her pass. | ||
| 10 | - get anoyed by robot | ||
| 11 | |||
| 12 | **for caretaker:** | ||
| 13 | |||
| 14 | + Spends less time watching the door and checking if everybody is still there. Therefore the caretaker has more time and is more relaxed to focus on the individual PwD. | ||
| 15 | + Less time is needed for convincing PwD to stay inside because the caretaker will only be notified in severe cases. | ||
| 16 | |||
| 17 | |||
| 18 | **for family member:** | ||
| 19 | |||
| 20 | + No longer have to worry their loved one being lost. | ||
| 21 | + Spend no more time with searching for their loved ones. | ||
| 22 | |||
| 23 | **From these aspects follow the claims:** | ||
| 24 | |||
| 25 | CL01: The PwD does not leave the care home | ||
| 26 | CL02: PwD's mood is improved | ||
| 27 | CL03: Robot brings PwD back to reality | ||
| 28 | CL04: The music reminds the PwD of the intended situation or place | ||
| 29 | CL05: No caretaker is needed to prevent PwD from wandering |